y2kcanucks
Le Sex God
How many of those games was he wearing a Canucks uniform?
So does that mean those 600 games never happened?
How many of those games was he wearing a Canucks uniform?
So does that mean those 600 games never happened?
Some of the defensive plays this guy makes leaves me scratching my head. For how big he is, he was pretty soft on some plays in his own end. I haven’t seen any other games so I am praying he isn’t as bad as what I saw.
To be fair it can happen but it's not the change in jersey that does it. Rather, a new team may put the player in a better spot to exploit his talents and minimize his weaknesses. So for Myers that would likely require a good amount of PP time and playing him 5-on-5 against 3rd and 4th line competition. Though for this contract you shouldn't need to do that but that is what will have to be done for his tenure to be a "success" (on paper).
For Gudbranson it would have meant putting him the pressbox.
The issue is, even if that is the tactic the coaching staff take, once injuries hit he'll be expected to provide more and he'll struggle. So history suggests. That's why I don't think the Jets are concerned over losing Myers even today. They weren't going to be able to count on him to provide that elevated play so they figured" what's the point in paying for that?"
Prepare yourself, there will games that Myers will look great and some will look bad. That's the nature of almost every player in the league, the difference here is that some are watching him with a microscope and will blow his mistakes out of proportion while remaining quiet when he does a good play.
Why would the color of the fabric he's wearing change anything?
It’s almost like they don’t need to play the games.
It's preseason and he's already playing as advertised by Jets fans, and as we expected. Putting an orca on his chest with Travis Green's amazing systems isn't going to change anything after 600 NHL games played.
Like I said, maybe that’s true. I would just rather wait until he actually plays some meaningful games with this organization before I label him the second coming of Eriksson and a catastrophic failure.
Call me unreasonable.
What?It’s almost like they don’t need to play the games.
What?
You are repeating the exact same narrative (with a new account I assume) that accompanied players like Gudbranson and Beagle etc in previous summers. That somehow a player's extensive history in the NHL is now complete irrelevant, that somehow a bad player with an established skillset and results would magically improve once Benning acquires him.
Just because you are completely clueless about 600 game veteran players outside the Vancouver market doesn't mean these players are unknown to other people.
What?
You are repeating the exact same narrative (with a new account I assume) that accompanied players like Gudbranson and Beagle etc in previous summers. That somehow a player's extensive history in the NHL is now complete irrelevant, that somehow a bad player with an established skillset and results would magically improve once Benning acquires him.
Just because you are completely clueless about 600 game veteran players outside the Vancouver market doesn't mean these players are unknown to other people.
So let’s not ignore it then
Nor should we. Doesn’t change a word I have said.
What's the over-under on the day the posts change from "give him a chance" to "he must be injured" when his play is as advertisd?
Sure it does, unless you believe he's going to magically transform into a good defenseman because the colours on his jersey have changed.
A nonsensical argument. There are countless players who have had a change to their career after switching teams. Sometimes good, and sometimes bad (as shown in another post).
First it was "wait until we see him with the Canucks"
Next it will be "wait until he's played a full season"
Then it will be "he's just adjusting give him more time"
How many of those games was he wearing a Canucks uniform?
Like I said, maybe that’s true. I would just rather wait until he actually plays some meaningful games with this organization before I label him the second coming of Eriksson and a catastrophic failure.
Call me unreasonable.
Those are younger players benifitting from a change of scenery. Not a 29 year old veteran of 600 nhl games played
Do you believe it is fair to judge Myers as a Canucks defenceman before he’s ever played a game for them?
No, that would be impossible, as you well know. However, it is completely fair to have a baseline understanding of this player to this point. Do you have one? Have you seen him play?