Wow, first, appreciate the work that went into that, and second, we should crowd-fund for him to get a streaming subscription so he could see the other 65%.
The analysis gives me a good chunk of hope that Poolman is being under-estimated and if so, he could fill a huge gap as a shut-down top-four. Still probably means Hamonic will be asked to play above his pay grade but an OEL - Poolman pairing that can hold its own would dramatically change the make-up of our defence in the right way, and I'd be happy to eat crow and say that Benning got this one right.
Fingers crossed.
Agreed. I don't have much faith in the Canucks' pro scouts when it comes to identifying Dmen, but there might be something here.
It has been discussed, but I think few acknowledge the restructure the Canucks have undergone starting with the OEL trade. The Canucks' cap structure now looks close to the way it should be. Up front, there's Pearson making a "middle 6" salary but it is the role he is expected to play. Otherwise, there aren't any bottom 6 players making $3M or more. On D, I mean yes, OEL is likely going to be overpaid for the rest of his contract but I think that he is still a legitimate top 4 Dman and he is expected to shoulder first pairing defensive minutes. We were paying Edler $6M AAV to play that role. There is a chance that OEL declines further and doesn't even play at a top 4 Dman level of course.
Anyways, the point is that ya it would be great if we can find a 27-28 year old Hamhuis or Tanev in here playing the right side for ~$5M AAV. Outside of that the Canucks are going cheap. Hamonic is making $3M but he only has an 8 team no trade and it's only for this season. Poolman, even if he's an upgrade over Benn, he is fine for his AAV.