arttk
Registered User
How is a guy that puts up one point considered a good bottom paring guy? Is he able to carry the 3rd paring? Nope. From all accounts, he’s fine when you limit his usage. Looking past his one point and one penalty, his adv stats is not that hot as well and it lines up with what the jets fans are saying. Or should I just take your word over all that? Seems like all your arguments are centered around the idea that Poolman is a good bottom paring guy. Yeah if he is one then the deal makes a little bit more sense. But really there is not a lot of evidence to suggest that he is actually a *good* bottom paring guy. So yeah, since I don’t think he is a good bottom paring guy, it makes perfect sense for me that a GM would think to offer a two way contract because they is exactly the price you would want to offer to a 6/7th guy, especially in the flat cap era.But Poolman is clearly not Megna. Poolman is considered a solid bottom pairing Dman. And for what it's worth Megna was on a one-way contract.
But there was no two-way offer. You haven't provided any links. It's quite meaningless to say that well there must have been one GM who saw Poolman as a 6/7th guy and would have only offered him a two-way contract and it's another matter to suggest that other GMs (as in the ones interested in Poolman) were actually offering him a two-way contract. You have given zero evidence to the latter. And why is the question whether Poolman is a top 4 guy or a 6/7 guy? Why isn't the question whether he is a top 4 guy or a 5/6 guy? Poolman is not being paid like a top 4 Dman. He isn't being paid like a 6/7 guy either. He's being paid like a 5/6 guy.
The market is the market. If you're shopping for detached home in the City of Vancouver and planning to make a $600K offer because that's how you valued the home then you're just wasting everyone's time. The UFA market is no different. If the valuation is too rich then stay out. If you're making a two way offer to Poolman when he's fielding multi-year one-way offers you're wasting everyone's time and embarrassing yourself. Again, I don't like the AAV and I don't agree with term and fit, but I acknowledge that he's considered a solid bottom pairing Dman. The Canucks reportedly targeted him and likely liked him more than others. I won't be surprised if they wanted Poolman to sign for term as a way to lock up a good right side Dman on an affordable cap hit.
There is also no evidence to suggest that other GMs put in an actual competitive offer for Poolman as well. The only evidence we have is Benning saying he asked the agent and the agent told him there are 12 other GMs in on Poolman and he even mentioned that he doesn’t know what are the other competitions for Poolman. Nobody reported any other potential offer for Poolman right? in typical Benning fashion, he just took the agent’s word and derped his way into giving a bloated contract offer.
And yes, you might be right that there were no two way offers for Poolman because players like Poolman usually don’t get signed on the first day, especially with the flat cap. Benning probably was the only dumbass that thought of Poolman high enough to go after him on the first day while other GMs that are “interested” are just simply waiting it out because it’s never urgent to sign a 6th/7th “defensive” dman on the first day of FA.