canuckking1
Registered User
- Feb 8, 2015
- 12,775
- 13,769
Get to .500 tomorrow and the season resets.
We replaced a "Vezina calibre" goaltender who was due a ridiculous raise with an... actual Vezina (and Jennings, and Stanley Cup) winner for far less money. Are you saying we made a mistake in not signing Marky to an Eriksson-esque contract? What would your contingency plan have been if Demko got injured? Anders Nilsson v 2.0? Fact is that both our goalies have been pretty solid considering the pitiful defensive play in front of them so I apologise if my comment irked you but saying that Demko should get most of the starts based on good play against a team that would find it tough sledding in the DEL is going a bit far IMHO. Unless Demko can play Marky-esque hockey against GOOD teams consistently he will probably remain the 1b goalie simply because Holtby has been there and done that and done it at the highest possible levels. He would really have to stink it up to lose his 1a status at this point in time and with the Canucks playing like hot garbage in their own zone I doubt much will change in the goaltending picture. IMHO neither guy has won or lost a game for us singlehandedly and unless that happens a few times nothing will change in the pecking order.
Maths wasn't his strong subject either.
Disagree about cheaping out on a backup..especially in a compressed schedule...If your main guy goes down , you're cooked ..A normal regular season, I might agree with you...Hey if you started like this we could have discussed this like adults from the start. We gave up on a vezina caliber goaltender to roll with Demko so as long as he’s at least equal to Holtby he should be getting the majority of starts regardless. Not 75-25 but the majority. Otherwise we should have kept markstrom.
I personally think Holtby was redundant and his cap better used towards Toffoli or Tanev and a cheaper backup. And so far he’s been okay at best. Nothing against the guy personally. But I think he was a misuse of limited cap space.
We replaced a "Vezina calibre" goaltender who was due a ridiculous raise with an... actual Vezina (and Jennings, and Stanley Cup) winner for far less money. Are you saying we made a mistake in not signing Marky to an Eriksson-esque contract? What would your contingency plan have been if Demko got injured? Anders Nilsson v 2.0? Fact is that both our goalies have been pretty solid considering the pitiful defensive play in front of them so I apologise if my comment irked you but saying that Demko should get most of the starts based on good play against a team that would find it tough sledding in the DEL is going a bit far IMHO. Unless Demko can play Marky-esque hockey against GOOD teams consistently he will probably remain the 1b goalie simply because Holtby has been there and done that and done it at the highest possible levels. He would really have to stink it up to lose his 1a status at this point in time and with the Canucks playing like hot garbage in their own zone I doubt much will change in the goaltending picture. IMHO neither guy has won or lost a game for us singlehandedly and unless that happens a few times nothing will change in the pecking order.
You missed the best part. Demko has the 29th best save percentage. Look who's sitting at 28, only 0.02 better...Demko back at .900
nice!
Just commenting on the 1a / 1b portion, you could make a case that Demko is 1a. He just started two games in a row, and the first of a back to back, didn’t he? They’re of course going to go with Holtby next game, but it will be curious what happens after that. I personally think the 1a / 1b is going to flip flop a few times over this year, but I certainly don’t think Holtby has any sort of hold or is favoured to retain that role over Demko. If anything I personally think it’s the opposite.
I am glad we have both though, it puts us in a way better position especially with how congested this schedule is.
Disagree about cheaping out on a backup..especially in a compressed schedule...If your main guy goes down , you're cooked ..A normal regular season, I might agree with you...
Virtanen and Chatfield both should not be in the lineup next game. Virtanen is just useless right now.
Maybe package off Virtanen and Gaudette for a 3C..?Virtanen and Chatfield both should not be in the lineup next game. Virtanen is just useless right now.
Well if I were the coach I would have started the 1b goalie back to back (and then the 1a) given the quality of the opposition. I too am glad to have both and I don't want to seem like I favour one guy over the other. Demko showed great promise in last year's playoffs but I have a long memory and I distinctly remember all my Hab-fan friends telling me that Steve Penney was the second coming of Ken Dryden oh so many years ago. Holtby is, to me, a known quantity who is coming off a meh year after playing elite level for years before that. His contract is sane (I myself can't wait to read the Flames board about 4 years from now) and he seems mentally solid, just the mentor for Demko. Our goaltending looks good, now if only the team in front of them could get their collective butts together...
Agree on Chatfield....but while Virtanen might be useless right now, Roussel has been worse. Why he plays night after night, and guys like MacEwen and Gaudette have been sitting out is at complete mystery that only Green has the answer to.Virtanen and Chatfield both should not be in the lineup next game. Virtanen is just useless right now.
This is a mystery. It’s not even as if he doesn’t help the team...he actually hurts the team. That high stick in the offensive zone was one of the stupidest penalties I’ve seen.Agree on Chatfield....but while Virtanen might be useless right now, Roussel has been worse. Why he plays night after night, and guys like MacEwen and Gaudette have been sitting out is at complete mystery that only Green has the answer to.
Tyler Motte is one of those bottom six players that Tampa would draft and we would be like that team always strikes gold in the draft. He's an elite 4th liner and I really hope we don't lose him in the expansion draft.
Demko had a good game last game, and was the first goalie this year to do so, so he got the start. I really think it’s as simple as that. If next game Holtby has a so-so game, well, then I think it’s becomes Demko’s job to lose until he slips up. But if Holtby has a great game, he probably gets the start Saturday as well.
I’m generally fine with them rolling it this way when we have this many games in such a short stretch. With that being said, by seasons end we need to establish who is our starter, especially if we make the playoffs.
Chatfield looked good to me honestly