I'm going to break my the refresh button... Or my mind... we'll see which goes first.
Booth + B prospect + conditional 1st (making conf. Finals else 2014 1st and 2013 5th) for Cammy
Can't trade injured players.
Trading for Cammy w/ reduced salary would be beneficial for both Flames + Canucks, but I think that ship has sailed with us trading for Roy.
Can't trade injured players.
Trading for Cammy w/ reduced salary would be beneficial for both Flames + Canucks, but I think that ship has sailed with us trading for Roy.
Booth + B prospect + conditional 1st (making conf. Finals else 2014 1st and 2013 5th) for Cammy
Good god no, there's no way Cammalleri would be worth a 1st round pick. Yeah he's signed through next year, but at his price ($6M cap hit and $7M in salary) that's a bad thing. This is a guy who has put up 50, 47, and 41 points in his last 3 seasons.
If the Flames could get a 1st rounder for him he'd be long gone already.
I'd give a 1st rounder for him and someone like Rodin if the Flames ate half his salary. Then I'd flip Raymond to Columbus for a 1.
Shift those picks down a round or two and then you're talking reality. What makes you think Mason Raymond would net a better return than Jagr or Roy?
Only one 1st rounder has been traded this year for a rental and that was for Iginla. You really think Mason Raymond is going to be the other one that garners a 1st?
If he played for another team would you support the Canucks giving up their 1st rounder for him?
There is no way someone would trade a 1st for Mason Raymond.
Well, I guess Nashville did trade a 1st for Gaustad so anything's possible, but it's highly unlikely.
Not a fan of the direction Gillis is going in. The Roy trade is very good, however, I am against re-signing him at the price tag he's looking at.
I believe News1130 said this morning that his agent - something-or-other Kelly - said there have been/will be no discussions with the Canucks about a contract, meaning he will go UFA at the end of the year. That would make this a pure rental rather than a long term solution.
That could all change of course, but this appears to be the thinking for the moment.
I believe News1130 said this morning that his agent - something-or-other Kelly - said there have been/will be no discussions with the Canucks about a contract, meaning he will go UFA at the end of the year. That would make this a pure rental rather than a long term solution.
That could all change of course, but this appears to be the thinking for the moment.
I believe News1130 said this morning that his agent - something-or-other Kelly - said there have been/will be no discussions with the Canucks about a contract, meaning he will go UFA at the end of the year. That would make this a pure rental rather than a long term solution.
That could all change of course, but this appears to be the thinking for the moment.
I believe News1130 said this morning that his agent - something-or-other Kelly - said there have been/will be no discussions with the Canucks about a contract, meaning he will go UFA at the end of the year. That would make this a pure rental rather than a long term solution.
That could all change of course, but this appears to be the thinking for the moment.