Tiranis
Registered User
What exactly do you consider a second line player to be?
When people on here talk about 2nd liners they actually mean 1st liners. Perry, Getzlaf, Carter, etc.
What exactly do you consider a second line player to be?
- The nightmare that is his management of the goalies. I won't even get into commenting on how Pejorative Slured he is about how he communicates with them and how he chooses who plays. It's like I'm looking at a 5 year old rather than a professional dealing with two highly paid athletes.
Valky makes a great point there about Garrison.. he needs with a setup man on the PP and not with Edler who rarely passes point to point.
Brendan Morrsion
Daymond Langkow
Jason Arnott
are the best three center available who would you choose?
It really comes down to lack of C depth and RH Dmen. We aren't talented enough this year...."it is what it is" Todd Bertuzzi 1000x
Yeah but was anyone really that surprised?They dominated us in a 5 game series.
Agreed. None of those players would be anything more than dead weight.I don't see how any of these players help us.
What, making flippant remarks to the media about tossing a coin isn't professional? Gillis and AV are insanely lucky that Lu and Schneider have displayed professionalism of the highest degree so far.
The fact that Garrison is getting used so sparingly on the PP is as much an indictment on the organization's competency as anything else.
DD is better than any defenceman we have by an easy margin, their top 9 forwards are better than ours as it stands right now, and they were built for the playoffs (obviously...seeing as they cruised to the cup).
Because the Canucks are so much better with their 9th place in the west.
Maybe after Gillis gets fired for failing to put together a playoff team people will be able to admit that the hodgson trade was a very dumb move. Fine, he needed to be gone. Kassian does nothing for this team. 4th line grinders are easy to find, not so much for cheap top 6 forwards.
Although given that they will either need a massive turnaround in play or a rebuild I suppose waiting years for him to actually show any sort of consistency will be okay.
Thank god someone else notices this too, I've mentioned it a a few times now. Before Kesler returned, the Sedin line toyed with the Parise line helping Van to a 4-1 win.I just don't know how you watch a game like this and conclude that it's a line-up problem, rather than a coaching problem. I really don't. I mean, I know the guys are out there making the mistakes but they're not exactly being put in positions to succeed.
- Sedins start the game, get taken off after 16 seconds because AV doesn't want them out against the other top line. Instead he puts out there Raymond's line, they lose a face-off (that was a given) and concede a goal. Sedins did well playing first 12 games of the season against other top lines. Kesler comes back and AV decides they can't do it anymore. We get lit up with Kesler on the ice, lose games. Now it's continuing with him injured.
- Lapierre promoted to the 3rd line after a poor showing against Phoenix where he was to blame for 2 goals. Goat on the 2nd goal that pretty much sunk this game. That's not to mention that Lapierre did nothing in any of his games on that 3rd line.
- Still forcing that long pass on breakouts. Sure is working.
- All season long having trouble handling agressive, fast-paced teams that try to force turnovers. Instead of making simple breakouts, let's just keep forcing it.
- There's no guidance on set plays in the offensive zone. Players have to fend for themselves right now. Everything is just about getting it in and setting up a down low cycle.
- The nightmare that is his management of the goalies. I won't even get into commenting on how Pejorative Slured he is about how he communicates with them and how he chooses who plays. It's like I'm looking at a 5 year old rather than a professional dealing with two highly paid athletes.
- Won't even get into special teams because it's plain to see.
If it was anyone else this might be a sneaky reference to him playing a broken foot.Maybe in the regular season but not the playoffs. Kesler looked bad this season too as he was clearly a step behind. Assuming he comes back in a few weeks he'll still have to adjust and likely won't have much of an impact.
Agreed. None of those players would be anything more than dead weight.
We have seen edler play "god" mode before, He could do what DD did in the playoffs.
People forget DD was AWFUL and I mean AWFUL for the kings before the playoffs.
This team could do the exact same thing as the kings with a few changes.
It's a statement we have no playmaking defensemen. Garrison has a cannon but he needs to be aimed, loaded and fired. Who do we have that can do that? Campbell did it in Florida. Garrison with Ehrhoff might have been wicked. Garrison with Vishnovsky perhaps *hint* gillis *hint*?
Uh, not sure what you expect from bottom pairing dmen but you certainly aren't going to get much more than Tanev or Garrison. Ballard... well he's been mostly okay.Agreed, #2 RW #3C and #5-6D are needed.
Good coach, no longer effective.
It really comes down to lack of C depth and RH Dmen. We aren't talented enough this year...."it is what it is" Todd Bertuzzi 1000x
decent chance they'll miss the playoffs. Minny can take the div soon.
They dominated weak teams... NW was a joke division that year. Against good teams we split season series.
And I don't need to explain what happened when our goaltending/supposedly "talent scoring lineup" failed us in the SCF.