The Crypto Guy
Registered User
- Jun 26, 2017
- 26,924
- 34,426
People need to think of the Lindros trade. That is what it would take. Minus the 20 million of course.Ottawa fans still have not yet grasped they are not in control of this situation and are not picking Karlsson's destination. Buffalo seems like an unusual choice for a guy his age with no cup.
If Buffalo was going to trade Dahlin (which they wouldn't) the only thing that would make sense would be a youth package like Provorov+Patrick+.
there you have it folks, Dahlin is the 2nd most valuable asset in the NHL and he hasn't even played a single NHL game.
Ottawa fans still have not yet grasped they are not in control of this situation and are not picking Karlsson's destination. Buffalo seems like an unusual choice for a guy his age with no cup.
If Buffalo was going to trade Dahlin (which they wouldn't) the only thing that would make sense would be a youth package like Provorov+Patrick+.
Those mystery boxes are way too valuable here man. In real life I’d say sabres do it , but not on Hf. The goal here is to have the best prospects, not the best team.Trading a generational D man for a potential one sounds crazy, and it is. This all hinges on a scenario in which Karlsson doesn't seem like he will sign in Ottawa. Dorion's biggest job this summer is going to be reading the situation and making sure they get full value if they end up losing EK. If they hold out till after the draft they could be losing a year and a lot of value of a rebuild.
To Buffalo:
Erik Karlsson (signed to 8 year deal)
To Ottawa:
2018 1st overall pick (Dahlin)
Conditional 2019 2nd (becomes 1st if BUF makes playoffs)
G Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen
C Rasmus Asplund
Ottawa and Karlsson get a fresh start in this scenario. Buffalo can start to try and compete with a proven superstar. Ottawa starts the rebuild right with pick #1 and #4 in the draft, along with getting potentially another 1st down the road, as they will lose one next year or this year to Colorado. Luukkonen and Asplund will be solid additional building blocks in OTT.
You can never replace Karlsson, so you might as well get the next best thing.
People need to think of the Lindros trade. That is what it would take. Minus the 20 million of course.
Trading a generational D man for a potential one sounds crazy, and it is. This all hinges on a scenario in which Karlsson doesn't seem like he will sign in Ottawa. Dorion's biggest job this summer is going to be reading the situation and making sure they get full value if they end up losing EK. If they hold out till after the draft they could be losing a year and a lot of value of a rebuild.
To Buffalo:
Erik Karlsson (signed to 8 year deal)
To Ottawa:
2018 1st overall pick (Dahlin)
Conditional 2019 2nd (becomes 1st if BUF makes playoffs)
G Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen
C Rasmus Asplund
Ottawa and Karlsson get a fresh start in this scenario. Buffalo can start to try and compete with a proven superstar. Ottawa starts the rebuild right with pick #1 and #4 in the draft, along with getting potentially another 1st down the road, as they will lose one next year or this year to Colorado. Luukkonen and Asplund will be solid additional building blocks in OTT.
You can never replace Karlsson, so you might as well get the next best thing.
Never said he’s the 2nd most valuable asset. It’d be dumb for Buffalo to trade him for anything though unless a massive, massive overpayment. He’s exactly what they needthere you have it folks, Dahlin is the 2nd most valuable asset in the NHL and he hasn't even played a single NHL game.
OP isnt an Ottawa fan ,nobody in Ottawa would try to propose this type of deal.....Some Ottawa fans still have not yet grasped they are not in control of this situation and are not picking Karlsson's destination. Buffalo seems like an unusual choice for a guy his age with no cup.
If Buffalo was going to trade Dahlin (which they wouldn't) the only thing that would make sense would be a youth package like Provorov+Patrick+.
Well, they already have their franchise center, or one that's supposed to be their franchise center. So, who should they be trading this #1OV for? Matthews? Doesn't really make sense. Crosby? Older and makes even less sense. So while there might be players worth trading the #1OV, it's a pretty small list.
Counter: Buffalo just takes the elite defense prospect who's cost controlled and ten years younger than Karlsson.
I like how so many casual hockey fans are claiming the reason Buffalo won't do this is because of the age difference.
If Karlsson had no injury concerns Buffalo would accept in a heartbeat. Karlsson carried a non-playoff team to within one goal of the cup final, could you imagine if he was 100% with Buffalo's roster?
Ottawa wouldnt even bother to purpose it,makes zero sense....Actually, to be contrarian trading for Karlsson doesn't do anything for a team that has holes up and down the roster. It adds at a bare minimum 9.5M plus on top of four contracts: Okposo, Bogosian, Pominville, and Moulson that are dead weight. When we can get an elite prime asset to control over the next 5 seasons plus and keep our own prospects. This makes ZERO sense for Buffalo. Keep that and please, close this ludicrous thread.
I like how so many casual hockey fans are claiming the reason Buffalo won't do this is because of the age difference.
If Karlsson had no injury concerns Buffalo would accept in a heartbeat. Karlsson carried a non-playoff team to within one goal of the cup final, could you imagine if he was 100% with Buffalo's roster?
Actually, to be contrarian trading for Karlsson doesn't do anything for a team that has holes up and down the roster. It adds at a bare minimum 9.5M plus on top of four contracts: Okposo, Bogosian, Pominville, and Moulson that are dead weight. When we can get an elite prime asset to control over the next 5 seasons plus and keep our own prospects. This makes ZERO sense for Buffalo. Keep that and please, close this ludicrous thread.
I like how so many casual hockey fans are claiming the reason Buffalo won't do this is because of the age difference.
If Karlsson had no injury concerns Buffalo would accept in a heartbeat. Karlsson carried a non-playoff team to within one goal of the cup final, could you imagine if he was 100% with Buffalo's roster?
Do you think the Oilers would have traded McDavid for Crosby? I can tell you I would not trade Matthews for Crosby and he's not as good as McDavid
No one doubts Karlsson's talent, it's that age gap and how Dahlin fit's better for a rebuilding team. We do not even need to get into the whole "sign and trade" nonsense which makes 0 sense for Karlsson. Odds are Dahlin won't be quite as good as Karlsson but if he's close the extra 10 years are a world of difference.
That being said, I could see Karlsson with a healthy goalie dragging them to the playoffs but I think they are better served building properly.
Laine + Hellebuyck? I'd think hard about that if I'm Buffalo, assuming Winnipeg was stupid enough to make the offer.