I think it does "mean much".
40 or so players who did it at Nylander's age was my initial point. There have been very few. It's actually a super impressive feat for any player............for all the Leaf haters who keep trying to down-play what he's done.
Oh yeah. And Matthews. And Marner.
Thx for the info.
Well this was your original post
LOL. What a dumb thing to say. He's 22 years old and has had 61 points in the NHL TWICE. Very few players have ever done that in the history of the game.
I wouldn't quite call him "elite" but he's very damned good.
Here is the list dating back 20 seasons. It's almost 40 players long.
Thornton
Gomez
Richards
Heatley
Gaborik
Kovalchuk
Spezza
Staal
Horton
Vanek
Ovechkin
Malkin
Crosby
Kopitar
Stastny
Toews
Backstrom
Kane
Stamkos
Tavares
Duchene* Lockout season. greater than .75 PPG needed. 70 next season.
Hall* Lockout season. Greater than .75 ppg needed. 80 next season.
Seguin
Forsberg
Draisaitl
Nylander
Ehlers
Pastrnak
Arvidsson
McDavid
Marner
Eichel* Can do it this year
Rantanen* Can do it this year
Barzal* Can do it this year
Aho* Can do it this year
Mathews
Laine
Keller*Can do it this year
So 33 Players have accomplished the feat in the last 20 years, with another 5 players trending toward accomplishing it.
Over 35% of this list have been drafted it in the last 5 years.
So while I think Nylander is an excellent player, and he definitely has himself in some impressive company, this exercise shows that the list of players who have
ever hit Nylanders minimums is more extensive than
very few.
I also know that pre 1997 that there are 90
rookies to equal or exceed 61 points. That number is only going to get bigger as you include 19, 20 and 21 year olds who were not rookies. I'd wager you are looking at a possible pool of 300+ players who've had at least 1 60 point season pre 1998 before the age of 21. Making this historic list of players to achieve this much bigger than "very few" I'd bet it's more than 100 having 2 61 point seasons with the 80's really propping it up.
It's also a bit of a moot point as many of the players on this list are on another level from Nylander and aren't comparable at all. If I had more time, and motivation, I'd be much more interested in seeing where the range of the standard deviation lies for Nylanders group and how many players were in it. After all, cherry picking his minimum 61/61 to create some prestigious group is pretty unfair. I'm sure there are lots of players who've only missed out on this by a point or two and are much more comparable to Nylander's.