He's a big boy and can definitely fight. Now if only he could find the net with some regularity we might have ourselves a Lucic clone. Don't think he's quite as mean as Lucic used to be, but he's only 19 playing against guys who are mostly several years older than him. If he was in the CHL he would be an absolute nightmare for those kids.A San Antonio player shoved an opponent heavily to the ice, who then slammed into the end boards. The opponent got up with vengeance in mind, and a scrum ensued. The San Antonio player handled the opponents in the scrum pretty easily, like a man against boys.
I couldn't make out the name of the San Antonio forward until the officials restored order, but it turned out to be Kostin.
He's a big boy and can definitely fight. Now if only he could find the net with some regularity we might have ourselves a Lucic clone. Don't think he's quite as mean as Lucic used to be, but he's only 19 playing against guys who are mostly several years older than him. If he was in the CHL he would be an absolute nightmare for those kids.
I didn't mean to imply he should be in the CHL. It was meant more as an observation. He's so big and strong and still only 19. His goal scoring is up a touch to start the year, but I'd like to see him finish with 15-20. He's only on pace for about 10 right now, but the Rampage seem to be turning things around a bit recently so hopefully that leads to some higher offensive output from guys like Kostin and Kyrou.Which is why he is right where he needs to be. Why learn a game of physical dominance and power moves when you get to the NHL you won't be that dominant and have to make adjustments later? Learn to play the game other ways at a higher level and become a complete player amongst better talent. If he only skated 4th line minutes, then I would be concerned. If he's getting a regular shift +, then he's learning where he needs to be.
I have no doubt he would be above PPG in the CHL. Jaskin was nearly 2 PPG in his draft+2 season(granted in the Q) and I think Klim is a better skater and possesses a much better shot than Dmitri. At the WJC last year Kostin was an absolute beast. The Russian coach was highly questionable with his ice time(as Russian coaches tend to be) and he still led the entire tournament in points per games played(slightly higher than Mittlestadt and Necas). He obviously has some holes in his game and he still seems to try to do everything himself, but talent is unquestionably there. You don't get to draft too many kids at the end of the first round with his combination of size and skill. Still might not pan out, but I still have pretty high hopes for him.The good news about Kostin is his statistics relative to his similar aged peers in international tournaments. Kostin was averaging 4th line minutes in the WJC, but was still Russia's highest scorer. Svechnikov was on his line, but he ended up with half the points Kostin did, and I remember many fans saying that Kostin looked like Russia's best player throughout the tournament. Granted, I personally hate rating junior tournaments because it's such a small sample size relative to career numbers, but it's all we got for this kind comparison.
His AHL stats aren't going to wow anyone, but I don't think he's doing anything that indicates he won't have an NHL career. I still think he'd be more noticed in Kootenay (I think that was the junior teams that owned his rights) and wouldn't be surprised if he was well over a PPG there the last two years. He's so versatile with an arsenal of, at least, above-average tools. Just thinking it about him and Krebs together is a fun thought as a junior combo.
I'm not entirely certain what you were expecting out of Mikkola. His game has always been about defensive positioning, physicality, and being able to control the slot area on the defensive end of the ice. His skating is among the best I've ever seen for someone as big as he is. He's able to effortlessly glide to cut off offensive scoring chances and makes use of his body very effectively. However, his weakness has always been puck control. He can distribute and receive passes okay, but his ability to handle the puck in speed has always been what sets him back offensively. That, and his shot is pretty darn weak.I like Kostin fine, but considering our depth at forward vs. defense... I do wonder if we shouldn’t have taken Hague instead. That would have been a good get. Perunovich is very talented and brings something none of our other dmen really bring, Tucker and Andersson are both doing very well and play a physical game, but.... man Hague would be nice right about now. With one assist so far, Mikkola won’t be the answer we’re looking for.
My point with Mikkola is that we can’t afford to have a guy on our roster scoring ~5 points a season, no matter who it is. Yes, I know he’s a stay-at-home guy, yes I know he’s physical, yes I know he can skate. But if he isn’t producing offensively, he’s going to end up like Lindbohm, for whom many of the same things could be said. I mean 1 point in the AHL so far? Come on... for a guy his age, that is not nearly good enough. If he’s really that good at moving the puck, he should at least be getting assists. The fact that he’s not is problematic. I had hope that his offensive game would grow in North America, and even considering the small sample size, the little red light is starting to blink imo.
I mean 5 points is really bad though. Even a guy like Bouwmeester or Bortuzzo should be able to put up 10-15 points in a full season.If you are as good defensively as some here have said he is, you can afford a couple of guys on the team that are like that. Especially a third pairing defenseman.
Especially if he isn't playing on PP, which I assume he isn't, whether he picks up points is really at mercy of whether forwards convert. So long as they aren't generating offense he won't get much. I don't suppose he is highly skilled with puck, but his numbers look worse bc guys like Kostin and Kyrou aren't producing enough up front.My point with Mikkola is that we can’t afford to have a guy on our roster scoring ~5 points a season, no matter who it is. Yes, I know he’s a stay-at-home guy, yes I know he’s physical, yes I know he can skate. But if he isn’t producing offensively, he’s going to end up like Lindbohm, for whom many of the same things could be said. I mean 1 point in the AHL so far? Come on... for a guy his age, that is not nearly good enough. If he’s really that good at moving the puck, he should at least be getting assists. The fact that he’s not is problematic. I had hope that his offensive game would grow in North America, and even considering the small sample size, the little red light is starting to blink imo.
I am imagining a Roman Polak nowMy point with Mikkola is that we can’t afford to have a guy on our roster scoring ~5 points a season, no matter who it is. Yes, I know he’s a stay-at-home guy, yes I know he’s physical, yes I know he can skate. But if he isn’t producing offensively, he’s going to end up like Lindbohm, for whom many of the same things could be said. I mean 1 point in the AHL so far? Come on... for a guy his age, that is not nearly good enough. If he’s really that good at moving the puck, he should at least be getting assists. The fact that he’s not is problematic. I had hope that his offensive game would grow in North America, and even considering the small sample size, the little red light is starting to blink imo.
Looks like Jerabek has been pretty decent for them.Wah? Jerabek hasn't risen to the top of the AHL depth chart? But he was so close to being an NHL roster player when they traded for him.
Can someone tell me a more inexplicable trade? (OK, if you gave Jerabek a concussion first, then traded for him, that might qualify.)
This makes no sense, unless you're confining this to his AHL potential. Great that he was a top-pairing guy in Finland; Tom Koivisto was also a top-pairing guy in Finland and was best defenseman over there one year. NHL defensemen who are offensively limited and struggle to handle the puck are not top-pairing guys on any team, and they're not 2nd-pairing guys unless you're talking about some team that lacks depth on defense. His defensive awareness is what makes him a perfect 5/6 guy, where you can limit his ice time as needed so he's not exposed.I'm not entirely certain what you were expecting out of Mikkola. His game has always been about defensive positioning, physicality, and being able to control the slot area on the defensive end of the ice. His skating is among the best I've ever seen for someone as big as he is. He's able to effortlessly glide to cut off offensive scoring chances and makes use of his body very effectively. However, his weakness has always been puck control. He can distribute and receive passes okay, but his ability to handle the puck in speed has always been what sets him back offensively. That, and his shot is pretty darn weak.
He's been a very solid defensive defenseman all through his career, and was a top-pairing player on one of Finland's top professional teams. But at no point has he been a player that was going to become an offensive player. Saying that, he's probably the most NHL ready defensive prospect the Blues have right now. He could become a good bottom-4 player with top-pairing aspirations if paired with an effective offensive threat.
Oh wow, I had no clue being a top-pairing defensemen as a 20 - 21 year old in a professional league was something to ignore. Well geez, I guess potential is based solely on what one does when he isn’t in a different country.This makes no sense, unless you're confining this to his AHL potential. Great that he was a top-pairing guy in Finland; Tom Koivisto was also a top-pairing guy in Finland and was best defenseman over there one year. NHL defensemen who are offensively limited and struggle to handle the puck are not top-pairing guys on any team, and they're not 2nd-pairing guys unless you're talking about some team that lacks depth on defense. His defensive awareness is what makes him a perfect 5/6 guy, where you can limit his ice time as needed so he's not exposed.
Wah? Jerabek hasn't risen to the top of the AHL depth chart? But he was so close to being an NHL roster player when they traded for him.
Can someone tell me a more inexplicable trade? (OK, if you gave Jerabek a concussion first, then traded for him, that might qualify.)
Where did you hear about the scouting report? For me the entire transaction was inscrutable. It was just one more detail in a baffling season so far for this club.Bouwmeester and Gunnarsson were both coming off surgeries, and in the case of Bouwmeester, he had been in decline the last two seasons. It seemed that we had no left-handed defensemen in the organization ready for NHL duty if either Bouwmeester or Gunnarsson failed.
The Blues supposedly received a favorable report on Jerabek from J. J. Daigneault from his observation during Jerabek's time with Montreal. So we acquired him.
I have no idea how he has been doing in San Antonio. The Rampage has a poor record, and it might be hard to tell how Jerabek is doing by looking at his individual stats.