Read the post that i quoted. It stated that Backstrom is only rated higher because of this Cup run when in reality he has been better career-wise too.
All these elite players yet it was another first round exitExcept when Matthews scored the most goals out of all 4 in his rookie season.
Matthews>>>Backstrom
Tavares>>>Kuznetsov
Against the team with the 4th best record in the league.All these elite players yet it was another first round exit
All these elite players yet it was another first round exit
Kind of a push defensively and player B had the greatest goal scorer of all time on his wing and player A had a series of guys who wouldn't make the Caps top 6.Yeah, it's not like he's easily outscoring everyone else in this thread career wise.
Player A:
GP: 669
Goals: 272
Assists: 349
Points : 621 (0.93 PPG)
Player B:
GP: 815
Goals: 209
Assists: 590
Points: 799 (0.98 PPG)
Player B is leaps and bounds better defensively.
I think the long-term look at these players favors Backstrom even more than the short-term one.
I may be the biggest leafs hater
But its
Tavares > kuz
Matthews >> backstrom
Last time u guys won even 1 series Flames went to the finals. I dont think im gonna have to worry about u competing for stanley cups anytime soon . Maybe competing for playoff spots and first round chokes?We faced other elite players who were also tougher and more experienced, both of which clearly showed and were the difference in the series. Don't worry though they will be in much better shape than Calgary when it comes to competing for Stanley Cups for the next 7 seasons.
That u guys were saying is gonna be an easy win before the series. Funny seeing u guys back track nowAgainst the team with the 4th best record in the league.
Leafs fans are the main ones who chirp the Jets for losing to a team who had the 5th best record.Against the team with the 4th best record in the league.
I remember before the series they were saying bostons gonna be an easy win cause they beat them in the regular seasonLeafs fans are the main ones who chirp the Jets for losing to a team who had the 5th best record.
I'll take the pair that have already won a Cup.
They both went beast mode and over PPG in the playoffs. Meanwhile, Matthews goes ~0.5 PPG in two outings. 2 points in 7 games is egregious for a "first line centre", looooooool.
Kind of a push defensively and player B had the greatest goal scorer of all time on his wing and player A had a series of guys who wouldn't make the Caps top 6.
That's fair, but I still wouldn't include career ppg, I would look at the past 5 or so years.
Backstrom (and all caps) definitely are getting a bump because of their cup run, but it's moreso that they shed the label of cup chokers instead of outperforming their career or past production.
My current belief is that the NHL pecking order for top 2 C's going into next year is the following (with movement throughout the year probably occurring):
Pens
Leafs
Caps
EDM
- The rest.
I made a poll, also I'm not neutralNo it's not ''kind of a push''. Feel free to make a poll who is better defensively and see how many Tavares gets from neutral fans.
Most leaf fans I saw predicted 6/7 games. Obviously there will be the ones that are overconfident but that's like any fan base. When you have a line of Pasta/Bergy/Marchand it's not gonna be an easy win.That u guys were saying is gonna be an easy win before the series. Funny seeing u guys back track now
Can't speak for every leaf fan but I've never done that. Jets ran into an incredibly hot goaltender.Leafs fans are the main ones who chirp the Jets for losing to a team who had the 5th best record.
How the hell do people come up with Kuznetsov>Tavares?
Of course, because it benefits your guy. Like i just said it's hardly correct to say Backstrom is only ahead of Tavares because of this Playoff run, when he is actually ahead of him looking through their entire careers. You can cherry pick certain amount of years to put that into Tavares favor but that won't change the fact that career-wise Backstrom is still ahead of him, which is the longer sample size. Sample size was the thing questioned here.