Tommy Shelby
Registered User
- Feb 26, 2012
- 7,462
- 4,841
Dunk is a high grade AHL defender, that's the reason to keep him even though he has no chance whatsoever of an NHL future.
He's also a known commodity as well.
Dunk is a high grade AHL defender, that's the reason to keep him even though he has no chance whatsoever of an NHL future.
Pastrnak does not make any sense for the Avs..
We would have to add quite a bit to Duchene for a winger. Does not make much sense from an Avs POV.
Only thing that could make sense is if Boston trades Pastrnak for a young, quality D and trade futures for Duchene. Too bad that Sakic won't do that.
I today listened to the BSN Portzline thing in full length and lets just say that I want Sakic fired but if the alternative would be AJ and Dater running the Avs, I might have to give him a lifetime extension...
Jesus...
Regardless of position we need another high powered offensive player. MacK is really it right now. I love Rantanen and Jost and Lando, but they are not exactly PPG types.
I want a potential top pair LHD more than anything, but at this point I just don't see that happening. If it's between a Dman like Murray or a winger like Pastrnak I'm going with the winger every single time. The level between the two is too far to ignore for position sake.
The price wouldn't be nearly the same.
I'd love a side of pasta to go with our big mac.
Awesome comment.
I just want a trade. Any avalanche trade.
Be careful what you wish for
You clearly don't watch David Pastrnak...One of his best attributes is his work ethic. To illustrate him as a "one dimensional" winger like he's Jordan Eberle 2.0 is ridiculous. His shot is excellent, but he's every bit as good at playmaking. This isn't someone who floats around and waits for the puck - he's an incredibly exciting player to watch, he drives the play. To suggest that, at 21 years old, Pastrnak is going to settle in as a 55-60 points player "AT BEST," and be just a one way goal scorer, after literally just hitting 70 points, is crazy illogical talk. You basically took Pastrnak's great season at only 21, said "it's a fluke," downgraded him by 10-15 points (and you apparently think it's generous to only downgrade him that little since you said "at best"), and said that's probably what he's going to be from here on out. Landeskog isn't freakin Patrice Bergeron - he's a good two way player, but his non-offensive aspects of the game don't make up for the talent of Pastrnak. Your evaluation of what Pastrnak is...well, I don't even know how you justify that one. Joem has a completely fair argument about tying up money / investment in wingers, but I'm not spending more time on this one with you. Hopefully no poor Bruins fan wanders over here and sees post 875 and this.
So tired of this Will Butcher guy. Go and be Kevin Montgomery already and leave me alone.
So tired of this Will Butcher guy. Go and be Kevin Montgomery already and leave me alone.
It's not getting quite as much attention as I thought it would, but yeah it's already to an annoying level. I just thought it would be much worse in the MSM because taking shots at Colorado is the in thing for all levels of MSM.
Pastrnak does not make any sense for the Avs..
We would have to add quite a bit to Duchene for a winger. Does not make much sense from an Avs POV.
Only thing that could make sense is if Boston trades Pastrnak for a young, quality D and trade futures for Duchene. Too bad that Sakic won't do that.
I today listened to the BSN Portzline thing in full length and lets just say that I want Sakic fired but if the alternative would be AJ and Dater running the Avs, I might have to give him a lifetime extension...
Jesus...
Same. I thought for sure we would see some not so subtle sniping by Puck Daddy and TSN write-ups.
It's hard to be upset about mainstream criticism. This is a 48 point team that's the laughing stock of the NHL, it's inevitable and well deserved. I think they will have a massive turn around and be in the 75 to 85 pt conversation. But, until they actually do it, there's really no fuel to support that position. It's all futures and dead-weight subtraction (plus Varly health) that could all go wrong anyway.
I just don't get why they are not viewed similar to a Toronto or Buffalo going into the seasons they drafted Eichel and Matthews? I guess I should say I understand the MSM does not care about a small market team, unless it's negative of course. So why is that, because Sakic hasn't said they are rebuilding directly to Dreger?
If you let actions speak, they are tanking this year about as hard as Buffalo did going after McDavid.
They have three of their top six D slots left wide open to a collection of prospects, and a bottom pairing defender, as well as two of their top three center positions looking to be left to two rookies.
Does it get more obvious than that? I understand you can't tank for a specific player, but they are tanking for another top 4 pick fairly obviously IMO. Those teams were not talked about like they failed to do this massive shakeup that was supposed to change their fortunes in a positive way for the following season. I'm kind of sick of hearing about how Sakic should have whateverthefuk to be honest. Especially pertaining to the team and the 2017-18 season. He cleared the trash heap that he could without having to pay futures to get rid of a contract. I sure as hell don't want him paying futures to get rid of Soderberg or Colborne.
The hype is real.
This appeared on my FB [french]
They call him "excellent defenseman" and say he has a "bright future in the NHL".
"Hopefully Bergevin will convince him to sign in Montreal so he can take over the left side in the future".
Pastrnak for Duchene, Bigras and Greer
Similar to the Seguin trade.
Sakic apparently wanting a current top4 D kind of throws a wrench into the idea of tanking this year. If we fill that spot and Varly stays healthy and gives us just above average goaltending then we are probably picking outside the top10.