Why is it you guys never post links to stuff you reference? Not sure about you specifically Avs44, but there has been a lot of that going on lately.
POST A LINK! It's even easier now than it used to be for stuff like twitter.
Rumor: Avs Proposals/Rumors/Free Agents 17-18 Part VII
- Thread starter forsbergavs32
- Start date
- Status
Why is it you guys never post links to stuff you reference? Not sure about you specifically Avs44, but there has been a lot of that going on lately.
POST A LINK! It's even easier now than it used to be for stuff like twitter.
Avs44
Registered User
- May 16, 2011
- 21,714
- 10,291
I didn't reference anything in my post?
I imagine why the others didn't link is because it was said on live TV, likely CBC.
I just noticed that. I must have clicked the wrong post not paying attention. lol
I'm kind of off today I guess. In my defense my daughter had a rough night last night. Not much sleep.
- Apr 25, 2006
- 49,759
- 53,079
In Cobra's defense kingslayer talked about something that Friedman would have said concerning Duchene running out of patience (??) without providing any detail and seconds later AVS_19 hinted about Kypreos who would have said something about a possible Duchene trade for Juolevi and a 1st? Without providing any detail as well.
So yeah, I'm with Cobra here. If you hear that on TV at least provide some details/context and don't assume that everyone is watching? Thanks.
So yeah, I'm with Cobra here. If you hear that on TV at least provide some details/context and don't assume that everyone is watching? Thanks.
Avs44
Registered User
- May 16, 2011
- 21,714
- 10,291
From the main boards it seems Kypreos said Vancouver may be interested in Duchene? Appears Juolevi is Kypreo's speculation, though another tweet from someone who heard that indicates Kypreos said that is who the Avs are interested in? Seems very unclear.
Either way, I don't want Juolevi. A quick look over on the Canucks board indicates they'd love that deal. Juolevi apparently hasn't been developing too well.
Either way, I don't want Juolevi. A quick look over on the Canucks board indicates they'd love that deal. Juolevi apparently hasn't been developing too well.
UncleRisto
Not Great, Bob!
hockeyfish
Registered User
The Kingslayer
Registered User
Yah it was on CBC. Friedman said what he said and Kypreos started talking about the nucks perhaps having some interest with Juolevi being a piece. Hope to god Joe knows better.
Avs44
Registered User
- May 16, 2011
- 21,714
- 10,291
Gotta hope the Jackets lose several more games then. Wennberg has decent numbers this season but Jackets fans have been ragging on the guy all season. Hopefully Jarmo figures he needs Duchene to centre their top line.
I was watching the CBC segment, to summarize:
1. Sakic wants multiple pieces still.
2. Duchene is likely mad and expected to be traded. Probably had an understanding
3. Avs decent start makes it unlikely that Sakic is in a rush
4. No one is stepping up for Duchene
5. Vancouver is an interesting destination.
6. Sakic wants a defense-man like Sergachev
7. Juolevi is from the same draft as Sergachev.
8. Juolevi isn't as far along as Sergachev (kinda phrased like it would be Juolevi would be the basis and doesn't hold that much value compared to Sergachev)
9. Duchene has a family member in Vancouver organization.
1. Sakic wants multiple pieces still.
2. Duchene is likely mad and expected to be traded. Probably had an understanding
3. Avs decent start makes it unlikely that Sakic is in a rush
4. No one is stepping up for Duchene
5. Vancouver is an interesting destination.
6. Sakic wants a defense-man like Sergachev
7. Juolevi is from the same draft as Sergachev.
8. Juolevi isn't as far along as Sergachev (kinda phrased like it would be Juolevi would be the basis and doesn't hold that much value compared to Sergachev)
9. Duchene has a family member in Vancouver organization.
AvsMakar08
Registered User
Stastny was invsible when he played for Avs and then wound up playing on Blues 3rd line after he was not good enough on their top 2 lines. ROR wanted to get paid big time even before we signed him to a bridge deal. Duchy was our best player at that time and just imagine if other players start asking 1 or 2 million over to what they are really worth. We would be in the same position as Wings with most of the players agents follwing other overpaid contracts on the team. 1 or 2 or 4 million is not a lot, but if a top half of players are being overpaid then we will wind up in a cap trouble just like Wings.
Avs_19
Registered User
- Jun 28, 2007
- 84,899
- 33,052
He never said the Avs are interested in Juolevi. Just mentioned there's a feeling the Canucks are in the mix and then said "a lot of talk about Juolevi." He also went on to point out how Sakic wants a Sergachev type and Juolevi isn't that.
hockeyfish
Registered User
Obviously not paying much attention to Columbus, but Dubois one goal, no assists in 7 games. Maybe he becomes slightly more available now that he isn't setting the world on fire.
I was about to make fun of you and then I read your post again. Hope she's better now.
Cousin Eddie
You Serious Clark?
- Nov 3, 2006
- 40,152
- 37,330
hockeyfish
Registered User
Everything I've seen says he has progressed zero since his draft, and has possibly even regressed. There is way too much risk there.
- Apr 25, 2006
- 49,759
- 53,079
He was absolutely terrible last year wasn't he? Heavy regression and all. Every time that I read the Canucks board in the last 6 months they wanted to trade him while he still has some value, there must be a reason? Usually fanbases don't want to get rid of highly ranked prospects a year after the draft.
tigervixxxen
Optimism=Delusional
I dont think Juolevi is washed up but he's not close to contributing so to go for that suddenly very future heavy deal doesn't make sense to me.
Wow, there's actually some significant talks about this Juolevi thing hey?
I was super high on him in his draft year and still really like him as a prospect. But it does concern me a little bit that he came into camp as poorly as he did for Vancouver this September and was out of shape on top of not playing well.
That said, Juolevi + 1st for Duchene would be something I easily do. Even if the 1st is Top 3 protected I still do it.
I was super high on him in his draft year and still really like him as a prospect. But it does concern me a little bit that he came into camp as poorly as he did for Vancouver this September and was out of shape on top of not playing well.
That said, Juolevi + 1st for Duchene would be something I easily do. Even if the 1st is Top 3 protected I still do it.
hockeyfish
Registered User
tigervixxxen
Optimism=Delusional
I haven't heard it first hand but sounds like to me insiders just picked a new team the talk about that hasn't been flogged to death already.
Juolevi would be ok with me if it includes +++ the Nucks built up some prospect assets over the last year
Juolevi would be ok with me if it includes +++ the Nucks built up some prospect assets over the last year
Vaslof
Registered User
- Feb 1, 2017
- 5,080
- 3,925
I would imagine he has, otherwise we wouldn't have a chance at trading for him, nevermind them adding in that trade. I think Vancouver's pick would cover the risk.. They'd both have to bust for us to come out behind. Anyway don't really expect any of this to come true, it's just a rumor and Vancouver would be crazy to go for it.
- Status
