- Jul 25, 2006
- 31,335
- 21,779
Im thinking its gonna be something like 8 years 75 or 80 millUh oh for everyone else with rfas if long term is around 8 years he isn't gonna be a fun comparable .
That's gonna be an 11 aav
Last edited:
Im thinking its gonna be something like 8 years 75 or 80 millUh oh for everyone else with rfas if long term is around 8 years he isn't gonna be a fun comparable .
That's gonna be an 11 aav
Would be a wicked signing by sakic if he gets him for ten or under for eight years . I think it'll be a bit higher but who knows.I thinking its gonna be something like 8 years 75 or 80 mill
Yeah if its 8 years anything under 80 mill that would be awesome. Avs have always done a nice job resigning their own players to I guess you can call it a discounted price. You're right though, it probably wont be under 80, I'm hoping it's just 8 yrs at 80Would be a wicked signing by sakic if he gets him for ten or under for eight years . I think it'll be a bit higher but who knows.
They have the cap to burn atm so a bit higher atm would be fine for the aves with the cap most likely going up every year other than maybe the lockout year if there is one
Even if that were true, with the KGB levels of secrecy that's endemic in the Avs front office it's faint praise at best.I just don't trust those people when they think he's the best Avs outlet there is.
Source? I just linked a source from nhl.com saying he hasn’t talked to him sincethe draft.In an interview Sakic said he recently has contacted Rantanen and both sides are agreeing that long term is the way to go, now they're just working on the number. It should be done by training camp I'd assume
Uh oh for everyone else with rfas if long term is around 8 years he isn't gonna be a fun comparable .
That's gonna be an 11 aav
Source? I just linked a source from nhl.com saying he hasn’t talked to him sincethe draft.
Source? I just linked a source from nhl.com saying he hasn’t talked to him sincethe draft.
This is part of the article...Source? I just linked a source from nhl.com saying he hasn’t talked to him sincethe draft.
You do realize that lots of players around the league every year manage to sign contracts during the summer before training camp. There is literally not a single reason why you'd want to wait until training camp to sign the deal EXCEPT that it puts more pressure on the other side.It hasn't been done because Sakic and Rantanen agreed that they would work on it closer to training camp. It's likely Mikko wants to enjoy his summer in Finland before getting down to the business negotiating.
Avalanche GM Joe Sakic on unsigned Mikko Rantanen: “We want him here for training camp.” – The Denver PostYou do realize that lots of players around the league every year manage to sign contracts during the summer before training camp. There is literally not a single reason why you'd want to wait until training camp to sign the deal EXCEPT that it puts more pressure on the other side.
I also hope you realize that Mikko Rantanen won't be sitting at the negotiating table, drawing up contracts, creating spreadsheets and working on the deal himself. Like most players in the league he can enjoy his summer in Finland and have his agent do a deal.
The real reason why it hasn't been done is far more obvious: Because the 2 sides don't agree. Same as all the RFA's remaining to be signed.
We did that and have good contracts on our team. Besides, the Avs or Rantanen don't need any hand holding by the Leafs. The can come to an agreement on their own. The Leafs are irrelevant to them in anything other than a trade.Not everyone can give Matthews $11.6m x 5 and Nylander $7m x 5. Some of us want to have some good contracts on our team.
That's what I said....Yeah the deal is all done and all set they just don't want to finalize it because they want to enjoy the summer.
Of course..... if this was true they could have just signed it in June and had the whole summer off too. Occam's Razor my man. There isn't a contract because they don't have an agreement. I never said there'd be a hold out or it would linger to the regular season, but man one must be naive to think that both parties are just like "Eh...no need to get a contract done now, time to hit the beach."
That's not a 100% true. Contracts league wide are used as comparables and set contract trends.We did that and have good contracts on our team. Besides, the Avs or Rantanen don't need any hand holding by the Leafs. The can come to an agreement on their own. The Leafs are irrelevant to them in anything other than a trade.
Not everyone can give Matthews $11.6m x 5 and Nylander $7m x 5. Some of us want to have some good contracts on our team.
It was actually 6.96 ×6 in Nylanders case but don't let accuracy get in the way of your agenda
Those aren't good contractsWe did that and have good contracts on our team. Besides, the Avs or Rantanen don't need any hand holding by the Leafs. The can come to an agreement on their own. The Leafs are irrelevant to them in anything other than a trade.
Totally I am sick of all the nonsense sure surrounding the contracts. There good. Stop denying it as WingsMHN says. Besides, posters can whine about Leaf contracts on Leaf threads. Rantanen and the Avs could care less about Leaf contracts. They will get their own done.It's not just a river in Egypt, folks.
Totally I am sick of all the nonsense sure surrounding the contracts. There good. Stop denying it as WingsMHN says. Besides, posters can whine about Leaf contracts on Leaf threads. Rantanen and the Avs could care less about Leaf contracts. They will get their own done.