Dreakmur
Registered User
BTW- I have Fedorov and Luce on the same team. Has anyone made that connection yet?
Going for an all-over-rated team?
BTW- I have Fedorov and Luce on the same team. Has anyone made that connection yet?
Going for an all-over-rated team?
BTW- I have Fedorov and Luce on the same team. Has anyone made that connection yet?
Humorous- but not in the way that you think it is.Going for an all-over-rated team?
To be fair, the draft format ensures than no one who rates Fedorov much lower than the rest of the group will ever draft him, while those who rate him much higher will end up with him more often than not. There would be no way for Dreakmur to make us all wait for him to take Fedorov in a spot he feels is appropriate.Humorous- but not in the way that you think it is.
In this draft, Fedorov was selected 96th overall. My ten-year ATD look-back shows that it is the lowest he's ever gone. Over the five years prior to this one, his mean selection-slot has been 81.4. I guess the seven different GMs that picked him routinely earlier than he went here were ALL overrating him, and every last one of them thought too much of him.
It's risible on its face.
To be fair, the draft format ensures than no one who rates Fedorov much lower than the rest of the group will ever draft him, while those who rate him much higher will end up with him more often than not. There would be no way for Dreakmur to make us all wait for him to take Fedorov in a spot he feels is appropriate.
Slow down chief.just curious if dreak thinks his no 1 can get around fedorov or not. You can’t put skate him, probably or bigger or more skilled or smarter.
So I take it I'm not allowed to chime in on the draft thus why my posts are delted so often.
I'll just remain mum and do up my own thoughts offline
Thanks for the incentive
Also... Brian Savage?! Mr. October? Rucinsky? Brisebois? OK players but not ones I'd bet on bringing me to any land, nevermind the promised one.
(and all posts criticizing your Paul Coffey pick)I deleted 150 posts of "who can leave a list" or talking about things unrelated to the draft days later.
I'm going to do another pruning of posts today just to try and stretch this draft thread a little further. But given we're marching to nearly 1000 picks we're going to have 6/7 threads anyway. So I'm not sure why you're complaining that old drafts had at least 3 threads. Have you noticed we're on the third one already?
Previous mods have been doing this before, and just never bothered to ping everyone to let them know. And clearly doing so was a mistake.
So by all means you can complain, but I'll happily show you all the posts of yours I deleted.
(and all posts criticizing your Paul Coffey pick)
(and all posts criticizing your Paul Coffey pick)
I'm joking man.For the sake of transparency I don't think I did.
I didn't trim the first two threads at all
I'm joking man.
I was gonna say the same thing, about the same three players.
Not sure where VanI got his impression that people thought Montreal had a chance. It was a depressing era of hopelessness and everybody knew it.
Man, I still remember the mid-late 90’s like it was yesterday. Those were some depressing years to be a Habs fan. Sort of like the Bergevin era now..
But man were we awful..
Not comparable, we have much better pieces now, and a better prospect pool.
Hard to justify a rebuild to your 18m dollars invested in your 1D and 1G who are on the wrong side of 30.Better prospect pool yes, but the overall feeling that our management staff is completely and utterly clueless with the club having no clear direction is pretty much exactly the same.