Player Discussion At 47 the Senators Select Alex Formenton

Status
Not open for further replies.

BondraTime

Registered User
Nov 20, 2005
28,615
23,297
East Coast
Three main reasons:

1) Players who have already cleared waivers are waiver exempt until they play 10 NHL games or are on the NHL roster for 30 days. This is cumulative, so for example: if we called up Max McCormick and he played 6 games with us, we wouldn't have to expose him to waivers to send him back down. But if we called him up again and he played another 5 games with us, that is 11 total games, and we would have to place him on waivers again. Note: this doesn't mean that we CAN'T put him on waivers again if we wanted to. Example: if we called Hammond up because Condon got hurt or something, even if Hammond ended up backing up Andy the whole time and never played a minute, even though he's waiver exempt, we can still place him on waivers if we want in case we think someone might claim him.

2) players who have cleared waivers are allowed to be called up and send back down without having to clear waivers again if it is on an Emergency Recall (ie: replacing an injured NHLer on the mail roster). Under the CBA, the player called up can spend up to 10 games or 30 days on the NHL roster on an emergency recall without having to be subjected to waivers again, and these games don't count towards the 10/30 threshold of point #1 above. So it serves as injury protection for a team - you know there's a guy you can trust to play NHL minutes on your AHL team, you can stash him there in case someone gets hurt without having him count against the cap, and it doesn't even count towards regular waiver eligibility games.

3) You can waive a guy but not send him down. When a player clears waivers, you can still keep him on the NHL roster (there's no rule that you HAVE to send a player down after he clears waivers), and he is still waiver exempt until he plays 10 NHL games or is on the roster for 30 days. This tactic has been used before by NHL teams in pre-season who want to buy a bit of extra time to evaluate their guys. Waive a guy early in preseason, but keep him around and you've bought yourself a month to figure out what you actually want to do with him. In 3 weeks, if you want to send him to the AHL? He's already cleared waivers and still has another week of waiver exemption - just send him down, no risk.
Well there is my answer.

Thanks Bonk and Gil Scott
 

Sensinitis

Registered User
Aug 5, 2012
15,934
5,526
He made the team out of camp last year and has only gotten better since and thrived being the main guy in London.

I don’t see how he isn’t on the club this year, unless he has just a trainwreck of a training camp, which I highly doubt.

Pageau/Formenton/Paajarvi/Chlapik/Pyatt in the bottom six is great speed and good skill.
 

JungleBeat

Registered User
Sep 10, 2016
5,107
3,600
Canada
He made the team out of camp last year and has only gotten better since and thrived being the main guy in London.

I don’t see how he isn’t on the club this year, unless he has just a trainwreck of a training camp, which I highly doubt.

Pageau/Formenton/Paajarvi/Chlapik/Pyatt in the bottom six is great speed and good skill.
He needs to dominate the OHL before spending the year in Ottawa. Having him in the bottom six at this point in his development will just stunt his growth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jehkob

Alf Silfversson

Registered User
Jun 8, 2011
5,772
4,827
I think Formenton ends up as 40-50 point guy. But he does it mostly at even strength.

We need a coach who is going to push the pace. Guys like Formenton and Tkachuk will thrive on the forecheck in a fast attacking system.

I think Formenton is going to be a huge fan favourite.
 
Last edited:

RAFI BOMB

Registered User
May 11, 2016
7,389
7,646
How would you compare Alex Formenton to Alex Tuch? Could Formenton be similar to what Tuch was this year for Vegas? How would you compare their offensive upsides?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad