talkinaway
Registered User
It's missing "SHOOOOOOOOOOOOT"
and
"SHOOT THE F-ING PUCK"
They already had a fan do a "shoooooooooooot" video. You may have seen him. I think he played a little bit of hockey, too...
It's missing "SHOOOOOOOOOOOOT"
and
"SHOOT THE F-ING PUCK"
Habs suck at everything.
Weird thing was I thought there was going to be a "no identifying which teams, just the total number of players" policy, so what's up with the Habs saying they have multiple positives?
To some degree, hiding COVID results of the athletes is kabuki theater. Players absolutely have the right to keep their results and health history (negative, positive asymptomatic, positive symptomatic) private, but let's face it - unless we're going to allow teams to completely make up stories (ie Player X has a "groin strain" that will keep him out for at least two weeks of the playoffs when he really has a positive test), people are going to be able to put 2 and 2 together.
Although, admittedly, the Bruins didn't have much of a public leak when it came to their June 12th announcement that someone had an asymptomatic positive test, followed by two negatives. I'm no expert on the precise NHL rules and policies regarding COVID, but I would imagine that the positive player is medically cleared by now, presuming no further positive tests. But once the season and practices start....there are going to be questions when players don't show.
So dumb. Trying to hide things is only going to backfire. Be as transparent as possible without violating the player's privacy.
It's a weird situation. I can see why...I also can see the butthurt...I only found out last night
Are you part of the 50?
I have dual citizenship so yes
NBC never forgot that they were not allowed to use a Sportsnet camera last year when we had a problem