Or, alternatively, sometimes maximizing the performance of athletes involves having some faith and stability with the player.
Are these also the same people that argued against the dollars and term for Keller and/or others? Because technically, giving a UFA contract like that to Keller does the same thing. But, when it is done for Keller, it is clearly misguided. But not doing that for Strome is a sign that the organization is horribly-managed. You can't have it both ways. If you don't support the Keller deal, but then state our issue is that we don't provide faith/stability when the Keller deal does that, then you are getting caught up in the names and not the performance.
Let me ask, if there was any sense that what he was doing on the ice would keep him in Phoenix consistently, then wouldn't he have been told to look for a place on his own? A constant up-and-down performance on the ice limits his ability to do anything long-term. I would hope that if I had a job that I did some good work in, and some really bad work in, I would never know what work would be sent my way and what wouldn't be sent my way, since my performance has been hit or miss.
Keller went for 65 and 47 in 160 games. Strome had 16 in 48 games. If you think that they should both be afforded the same stability and faith, then I don't know what to say.
Maybe there is an expectation that a 21 year old kid should at least know how to contact an apartment complex to lease a unit if there are no guarantees that he can buy a house for an extended stay. Lyubushkin stayed in Galchenyuk's guest room. There are multiple stories of young players renting the guest house or guest room of another player, so this almost paints it as if though we gave him no options to live.