CamPopplestone
Registered User
- Sep 27, 2017
- 2,515
- 2,896
To be fair that isn't a super bad insult. I pretty much have the same opinion. We didn't do as well as we should have. Less than the sum of its parts
It was in response to being asked about how great the Canes' d-core looked on paper, and how he could play with anyone and it could be a good pairing. That was his reply. Basically saying it's not good enough to have that on paper, they need to go out and actually play well.
What I find funny is even when Nashville weren't a playoff team hf considered them to be a god sent defensive team. Even when the Flames make the playoffs, hf still brings up "4 #1Dman!" to antagonize the Flames. It's just weird how when we don't make the playoffs because of worst timing goaltending implosion, unsustainably bad luck in shooting percentages, terrible line decisions, and poor special teams, our defense gets antagonized the most.
Couldn't be because we have certain posters that like to scream at the top of their lungs on the main boards about how Brodie is a Norris caliber D-Man. No sir.
I think the part that's mostly the jab, is the fact he's talking about team chemistry and not being 'good', on a team he's left. Guys who leave or get traded, rarely end up talking about their old team. You get some "Well, it just didn't work out, I'm happy to be with the new team." You rarely, if ever get "We were suppose to be really good, but we weren't good."
Like, even at the TDL when bad teams trade their good players you get "I'm happy to be back in the race." Maybe you get the "It was tough not being in the picture" type comments... but overall it's just something that's not really done in hockey.
What I find funny is even when Nashville weren't a playoff team hf considered them to be a god sent defensive team. Even when the Flames make the playoffs, hf still brings up "4 #1Dman!" to antagonize the Flames. It's just weird how when we don't make the playoffs because of worst timing goaltending implosion, unsustainably bad luck in shooting percentages, terrible line decisions, and poor special teams, our defense gets antagonized the most.
Main boards is a terrible place. I think it was Hox who once greatly compared it to an Ex that he would keep going back to see despite having the foresight that he would live to totally regret his decision
Hox knows all about regrettable decisions.
Not as much as Mrs. Hox, she did marry him after allHox knows all about regrettable decisions.
Brady had 2 goals in his first pre-season game
Man I wish we had found a way to get him. He honestly reminds me of Getzlaf.
Chris?
Like, I know you’re trying to be funny. But when your opinions are s outlandish and ridiculous as yours are. The joke doesn’t seem very funny. Because I almost feel like you believe that
Brady had 2 goals in his first pre-season game
Man I wish we had found a way to get him. He honestly reminds me of Getzlaf.
LOL
It was just meant as a fun joke but it isn't that far from the truth, both have talented NHL stars for brothers, both are very good athletes in their own right and both are guys you don't want on your NHL roster.
Did you watch the summer showcase, or last year’s WJC? The guy dominates against his peers. He is a special talent. And just like his brother went through (certain major publications had each guy ranked in the mid teens) people think he’s a goon and therefor has no skill. Which is simply not true.
Draft -1 season: 23 points in 24 games in the USHL. (Very good production)... Boeser for example had 4 points in 8 games
WJC - draft eligible - 9 points in 7 games against older kids (pretty impressive when comparing to other draft eligible players who usually struggle in that tournament)
Boston College 31 points in 40 games. Literally only Eichel has had a better offensive season as a draft eligible player playing in the NCAA (and he’s in hockey east the SEC of college hockey). For example Johnny was a point per game in his first season yet that was his draft - 1 season. Does anyone question Mittlestadt even though he’s older, in a worse league and was at like .5 Ppg until after the WJC when he started to take off.
But yes, he can’t produce...
So are you saying any player that has good, not great offensive production at a young age is going to have success at the NHL level?
Is it not possible that sometimes those numbers don't translate?
I mean I know he would be the first player in the history of the WJC tournament to have a good, again not close to great, tournament and not turn out at the NHL level but it might just be possible.
As for the MIttlestadt question I certainly question him at the NHL level.