Josepho
i want the bartkowski thread back
Nobody disputes that it was a bad call. That is neither here nor there for this discussion.
I'm guessing you have a larger ignore list than I do.
Nobody disputes that it was a bad call. That is neither here nor there for this discussion.
I was not overly impressed with Karlsson throughout most of the series, but last night, he kicked it up a notch..quite amazing.
he also looked crazy to me, twitching and talking to himself when they isolated on him. not sure what he ate to get himself right for the game but i am pretty sure he shouldn't eat it often.
Would you feel the same way if Vegas had killed the penalty?
Yes. I said at the time it was perhaps the worst major call I’d ever seen made.
And San Jose scores 4 PP goals without their arguably beat PP player in Pavelski. A wash at best.I think when you add in the factors it's more than "well they shouldn't allow that many goals". No they shouldn't. But factor in a long series, a physical series, a game 6 double OT and the guy getting sent off is not just a major part of the your top 9 but also a PKing forward on the team...
Weird how the Sharks seem to be on the benefiting side of officiating. I can understand championship teams getting the benefit of the doubt but the Sharks?Yes. I said at the time it was perhaps the worst major call I’d ever seen made.
Would you feel the same way if Vegas had killed the penalty?
I think when you add in the factors it's more than "well they shouldn't allow that many goals". No they shouldn't. But factor in a long series, a physical series, a game 6 double OT and the guy getting sent off is not just a major part of the your top 9 but also a PKing forward on the team...
And now factor in how the call came about. Neither ref was making a call. The linesman that dropped the puck was no longer facing the play. The other linesman can't possibly have a clear view of what happened (unless all of a sudden a light cross check to the shoulder and chest area is considered a must call). They made the call up based on what they thought happened. Not what they actually saw happen. That's the issue. That's why it's embarrassing and why the whole series of events never should have started in the first place. And that's important regardless of what Vegas did or did not do. It was a massive mistake by an entire officiating crew at a crucial time. Not a small issue of a phantom tripping call but about as big of a mistake that can be made.
This wasn't a borderline call that was legitimately seen by an official as a 2 or possible 5. This was a completely made up 5 minute major call which is akin to attempt to injure. A call and misconduct that I can all but guarantee would get rescinded by the NHL IF Vegas had pulled out the win. Because Vegas didn't win they will try to sweep it under the carpet.
I think what makes it even worse is not just the vegas loss but that they legitimately let honest to goodness dangerous play go and made up a call on a play they didn't see (Fleury getting run in OT not much before the winning goal was scored. I wonder how much just getting run on a similar play messes with his head on the winner?).
Lol only fitting Trotz will face his old club.
do people think the refs deliberately gave a penalty they didn't think happened to help the sharks or to be safe, or do you think they just misinterpreted their peripheral fleeting view of what happened?
i had assumed the latter. it was a strong cross check and the point of impact may not have been visible. the way pavelski went down could look like he'd been chopped down. plenty of room for the mind to fill in the rest for a match penalty.
Lol only fitting Trotz will face his old club.