We've told you. You're literally flip-flopping back and forth on stances every single time one thing changes, and taking that to the extreme of extremes.
Mitch has a bad game. He sucks, they need to draft a new QB, fire Pace and Nagy. He has a good game, and your stance completely flips on him and he's great.
Bears don't absolutely dominate a game, fire Pace and Nagy, and ignore all the good they have done, and ignore how dominant this team is, with the exception of QB play, and all the outstanding players Pace has brought in. I mean... the Mack trade, alone, would buy Pace another year or two, for me.
Hawks have a bad preseason game. Fire JC and Bowman. Then they play a good game, and your stance flips. Or like with the Nylander thing, now. Nylander has looked good, but the Hawks D corps. has looked bad, so the trade was a loss, and Bowman should be fired, because they could have used Joker. Nevermind that their middle pairing missed the game... forcing two AHL D into the lineup.
When you change stances at the drop of a hat, based on very, very, very tiny sample sizes, it makes you look like you have no clue what you're talking about, and you're just going with whatever is the flavor of the day as far as what other people think about something.
The hot takes I've pointed out above, and then doubling down, tripling down, etc. are not a good look... like ever. Neither is flip-flopping your stance after every game.
