We all have different opinions. I don't agree with all he does, and even less of what he says. I think very few politicians in DC show much actual leadership. I think if we had an actual discussion about leadership, you'd find we probably don't have too many differences. Policy differences - yeah, I'm sure we'd have plenty. But please don't pretend to know what you think my definition of leadership is until we've had the chance to actually talk about it.I find it interesting that you and I would differ over what we think is leadership.
Not who.....but what.
no one said give it out willy nilly but if that makes you feel better saying it so be it.I’m talking about restrictions and stipulations on people that take our money. If they don’t want to meet them fine, just don’t take the bailout. But whatever, just hand it out willy nilly I guess. Didn’t hurt the last time people were suffering and going hungry! Went very well!
less unemployment time the better for those suffering. The Lower the wages the better too! That’s what I say!
What would you have him say - We're going to lock you in your houses for unknown number of months? That may be the truth, and he may know that, but saying that doesn't do anyone any good.
"As I said different priority's your willing to hang up a bill due to your stance that bailout money to corporations should come with no guardrails or worker protections. "as i said different priority's your willing to hang up a bill due to your stance on greenhouse gasses and how they affect the world. While i believe something has to be done on that front i believe this is not the time or place and people need help now. but as you said to each their own..people will just have to wait for help while we fight the never ending climate change battle.
"As I said different priority's your willing to hang up a bill due to your stance that bailout money to corporations should come with no guardrails or worker protections. "
Both sides need to agree. One side is pushing for massive unstipulated funding for major big business industries, and the distribution of that money at the will of the administration. The other wants to ensure there are stipulations tied to that money that protects workers - like preventing the money from going to stock buy-backs, or ensuring that industries that take money offer paid sick leave to employees.
no one said give it out willy nilly but if that makes you feel better saying it so be it.
no stock buy backs - I get it
no money to executive bonus - i get it
cut your carbon footprint by X date - total bull shit
you keep saying about last time. breaking news this is not 2008 anymore so why you keep bringing up what a congress (senate and house) agreed to for a packaged in 2008. and that has what to do with now other than we have a ton of the same people passing the bills including yes you guessed it the same speaker of the house Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid (senate majority leader Democrate). They (Democrates )controlled both sides of congress in 2008 and are the ones that passed the terrible 2008 package you keep referring to yet you are hell bent on being on their side again now in 2020 while at the same time ripping into what they did in 2008.
go figure
question who do you blame for the 2008 package you keep referring too
Sorry, but no.
More people will be hurt if the economy goes into a true depression than would be by the virus.
At some point you have to cut your losses, at some point the greater good is getting the country and economy going again.
Yes, people are going to die. They will die regardless. Call me heartless or whatever, I don't care. But more damage is done the longer you have 30%+ of the country sitting at home with no income.
Something along the lines of isolate the elderly and high risk populations from the world until it settles down is a far better choice for everyone than just shutting down everything.
The only good news i am seeing in terms of cases is each day in MA the rate is growing somewhere in the 20-30% range. I have not seen all of the states but if we can keep it in the mid 20's and don't see the 40% increases that Italy saw maybe we are helping the curve.
We all have different opinions. I don't agree with all he does, and even less of what he says. I think very few politicians in DC show much actual leadership. I think if we had an actual discussion about leadership, you'd find we probably don't have too many differences. Policy differences - yeah, I'm sure we'd have plenty. But please don't pretend to know what you think my definition of leadership is until we've had the chance to actually talk about it.
I'm just pointing out that you condemned him saying he'd "like to" get the country open again by Easter (still almost three weeks away), as a "total refusal to follow doctors and scientists input." If he went against scientists input and actually did order the country back to normal, then you'll be totally justified. What he says and what he does are often in conflict, but I think there's more to point to him listening to scientists than not. travel restrictions, early declaration of both public health and national emergencies, quarantines.
What would you have him say - We're going to lock you in your houses for unknown number of months? That may be the truth, and he may know that, but saying that doesn't do anyone any good.
Where does he say these are his actual plans? Just because he'd "love to" have the country back open by Easter, did he say that's the actual plan? I'd "love to" retire in five years, but I'll have to wait until that time to evaluate the situation. Can we wait until the time actually gets here before damning things that haven't even happened yet?
That's definitely fair. Middle ground would certainly be nice - it just seems that middle ground has disappeared in both Washington and in the media these days. Unfortunately, I think that's where the majority of us live.Imo downplaying it doesn’t do anyone any good either though
That's definitely fair. Middle ground would certainly be nice - it just seems that middle ground has disappeared in both Washington and in the media these days. Unfortunately, I think that's where the majority of us live.
FWIW, none of the monies were "bailouts", they were no-interest loans that had to be paid back. Actually that's the same situation as the "bailout" in 2008. No- or very low-interest loans, coupled with some stock purchases by the Fed. Large majority of the loans were paid back by the banks by 2011."As I said different priority's your willing to hang up a bill due to your stance that bailout money to corporations should come with no guardrails or worker protections. "
Both sides need to agree. One side is pushing for massive unstipulated funding for major big business industries, and the distribution of that money at the will of the administration. The other wants to ensure there are stipulations tied to that money that protects workers - like preventing the money from going to stock buy-backs, or ensuring that industries that take money offer paid sick leave to employees.
Some of u really need to pay attention to other stuff than “the news” quarantine sucks but watching and paying attention to this stuff 24/7 Isn’t healthy.
I try to avoid the news as much as I can even before the virus it was just negativity. Doesn’t even matter which side of the fence it is. Negative mass media hypnosis.
That's definitely fair. Middle ground would certainly be nice - it just seems that middle ground has disappeared in both Washington and in the media these days. Unfortunately, I think that's where the majority of us live.