Redux91
I do Three bullets.
I think the hype for this kid is a little too high from what ive watched of him
Nah, Romo's waaaaay more of a sure thing than even ol Cole Coff
I think the hype for this kid is a little too high from what ive watched of him
Nah, Romo's waaaaay more of a sure thing than even ol Cole Coff
Agree, I don't see any way Romanov is not a top 4D, he is just too steady and well roundedNah, Romo's waaaaay more of a sure thing than even ol Cole Coff
Yeah, not all about the slapper. Malakhov would wrist it from the point and be a way bigger threat than your above average slap shot. Love a good wrister from the point, it’s a form of art really.His snapper looks deadly, I like to think I can spot a deadly snap after all these years.
Nah, Romo's waaaaay more of a sure thing than even ol Cole Coff
Don’t want to derail this by mentioning other players, but getting Edmundson this offseason should surely help Romanov’s development.
At worst we have 2 solid* LD and two good* RD, so theres no immediate rush to put Romanov on the first pairing, a la Mete in his rookie year. If he starts on the 3rd and works his way up, it will be up to him.
Exciting stuff honestly between waiting to see how him, Suzuki and KK grow this year
I agree ! And an other thing is that Edmundson can play both side so if Romanov surprised and he can already be in the top 4 or he progress during the season and at the end of the season he’s ready for the top 4 duties, we could have a really solid 3rd pair where wouldn’t be scared to put them on the ice in big moments with Kulak/Mete and Edmundson
Not many considering this but it could end up this way... A lot of Kulak concerns in our herd but at the end of the day, there is two versions of Kulak. Kulak down the stretch in the 18/19 season and in the playoffs last year and Kulak last season. It's consistency issues and does he figure that out? Who knows but I do believe the Habs management values his mobility and physical game
Chairot / Weber
Kulak / Petry
Romanov / Edmundson
I don’t think that will happen though. I don’t see Kulak surpass Romanov and Edmundson and they already said that the plan is to start with Edmundson-Petry. Kulak is 6/7th defenceman who can make the job on short period of time when they are injuries but held not a valuable piece on a long term. And I don’t see where you see a physical game with Kulak. It’s probably the thing that bothers me the most with him. He loose alote of his battle in front of the net and in the corners and that’s probably why I think that sign Edmundson.
Like some people have said Goaltending is the most fickle position so I would have to pick Primeau. Yeah he's looked great but for no particular reason he could start giving up 5 goals a game and fall out of favour real quick. Goalie is a wild position
Especially if they have forwards who will actually go to the net for rebounds and tips! Besides Gally. I think in the past, everyone but him ran away to the bench anytime there was a rebound! Example - I don't remember pacioretty ever getting his nose dirty.Yeah, not all about the slapper. Malakhov would wrist it from the point and be a way bigger threat than your above average slap shot. Love a good wrister from the point, it’s a form of art really.
If Romanov can develop that, we are in business.
Not about surpassing... more about sheltering and the right pairing mix for how the Habs will try to roll the lines and D pairings. Can Romanov move up the line-up like Suzuki did as the season goes along? Very possible
From what I've seen, he's got the tools and especially the mental fortitude. I think he'll have a long career.Primeau is more a sureshot than any goalie we've had since Price and Halak.
Pretty sure he's a backup at minimum, which, as a 7th round pick, would be far from a bust.
But the defensive pairing or not like forward I think. You want to have your best element on your top 4 so you can used them the more time possible. Espicially when you have Weber and Petry on your team. For Romanov and Suzuki, yes it’s possible and it’s probably what the organization hope.
Understood! And I doubt the Habs signed Edmundson to play bottom pairing. However, knowing Julien... I think he will shuffle things around depending on who we face. Chiarot with Weber started against the Bruins and then he liked it and it stayed.
For all we know, Romanov comes out flying and he forces us to play him with Weber. Or he doesn't and we go to plan A which is a sheltered role. Who is Romanov's partner? Hey, we are board so maybe I'll go create a poll and we can look back at it after the season
I think it will be Kulak but I would have like us to acquired a veteran 3rd pair RD to replace Kulak who could help Romanov in his development a little bit like what Thompson/Kovalchuk did with Suzuki
I doubt we make any more moves on D but if we do, Kulak and/or Mete have to go the other way
It's such a rare commodity, that you had to go back to 1996 to find a Defensman that had a solid wrister from the blueline...Yeah, not all about the slapper. Malakhov would wrist it from the point and be a way bigger threat than your above average slap shot. Love a good wrister from the point, it’s a form of art really.
If Romanov can develop that, we are in business.
I don’t think that will happen though. I don’t see Kulak surpass Romanov and Edmundson and they already said that the plan is to start with Edmundson-Petry. Kulak is 6/7th defenceman who can make the job on short period of time when they are injuries but held not a valuable piece on a long term. And I don’t see where you see a physical game with Kulak. It’s probably the thing that bothers me the most with him. He loose alote of his battle in front of the net and in the corners and that’s probably why I think that sign Edmundson.
What is a good comparison for him? I don’t see him being a huge point producer or PP QB but see him being a real well rounded , top 4 D
That looks about right, good comparisonI'd say an NHL comparison of who can be similar to would be Dmitry Orlov. Physical, can log lots of minutes and hopefully can put up 25-30 points.
I'd say an NHL comparison of who can be similar to would be Dmitry Orlov. Physical, can log lots of minutes and hopefully can put up 25-30 points.