Sterling Archer
Registered User
- Sep 26, 2006
- 22,989
- 13,458
How are we going to know what his actual abilities are until he does it with consistency?
He has been consistent and in a men’s league where he’s improved consistently and given more ice time and responsibilities throughout the season. It’s pretty obvious you haven’t followed him at all and spend all your time going next over Brooks’ stats in junior because you’d know this and that playing on the KHL and consistently given more ice time as an 18 year old is almost completely unheard of. Yet you think he hasn’t proved himself more than other prospects who were playing against boys but were dominated when playing against Romanov. Don’t you see that makes no sense whatsoever?