Prospect Info: 4th Overall, Bowen Byram, Defence

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tweaky

Solid #2
Sponsor
Apr 5, 2009
5,548
1,801
Singapore/Thailand
Hayton, Veleno and Lafreniere are the only possible (forward) holdovers from that years roster. Fair chance Hayton stays in Arizona, though the other two should be there barring injury. Cozens, Krebs, Tomasino and Suzuki seem like locks to join Newhook in moving up from the U18 roster last year. Akil Thomas would be on my prelim roster as well. Poulin, Foote, and Pelletier also. Not sure who else to add...Foudy?

For the defense, Byram is about as close to a lock as there is this year. Out of the eligible players from last year, Dobson is likely to stick in NYI, but McIssac and Smith are/should be back in juniors already. Not sure McIssac deserves a spot though. Harley would be a safe bet. After that, I am not sure.

Not going to guess on goalies. I have ideas, but...
 

Avs71

Registered User
Aug 12, 2008
8,958
4,415
If Byram made the Avs, he may be the youngest looking player the team has ever had. He looks young for an 18 year old forward making the team, let alone playing defence. Guys like Doughty, Bogosian, Dahlin, Ekblad, and Schenn at least looked like they were over 18 when they joined the NHL.

Happy to see him grow, mature, and get stronger outside the NHL. Seems to have worked for Makar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkT

MarkT

Heretic
Nov 11, 2017
3,997
4,513
Count me is as someone happy he was sent down. He didn't look ready in any sense. He didn't look defensively ready, offensively ready, physically ready, or mentally ready. He needs to work on everything and give it another shot next year. Meanwhile he can try to dominate the WHL and the World Juniors. If he doesn't develop this year that's on him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LTC Pain

Vaslof

Registered User
Feb 1, 2017
5,020
3,851
If we picked a forward they'd probably have made the team with just an OK camp performance. We're just way deeper on defense atm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kaizer

AvsCOL

Registered User
Jul 16, 2013
4,853
5,209
You think there’s 13 better forwards than Newhook?

I think Newhook will make it, but they'll utilize him in a 3rd/4th line role so you won't notice him much. The bias in the Canadian hockey association is very real. You can almost guarantee Kirby Dach will be centering LaFreniere and Veleno, and it doesn't really matter if anyone outplays them, they're that stubborn.

Look at how Cale Makar was held back by Kale Clague the year he played well in the WJC. Was clearly the better defenseman, but Canada had their minds made up before the tournament even started that Clague was better.
 

Ararana

Registered User
Sep 22, 2013
17,668
27,583
Two Rivers
If we didnt have Rosen and Timmins playing well I think we might have seen Bo suit up for sure.

Very true. The defensive depth probably played a huge factor here.

Good new is the mem cup and world juniors are going to be super fun for us now. Not to mention all the highlights we're going to get of Byram destroying the WHL again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Kingslayer

Foppa2118

Registered User
Oct 3, 2003
52,277
31,362
If we picked a forward they'd probably have made the team with just an OK camp performance. We're just way deeper on defense atm.

They picked a forward a year ago in Kaut. He's physically ready for the NHL and had a pretty decent camp but they still didn't rush him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: avsfan09 and MarkT

Avs44

Registered User
May 16, 2011
21,687
10,180
I would've loved to loan him to SC Bern, but Byram doesn't seem like the type of bloke who would want to do that.

Yeah, I really wish some of these kids would be more open to going to Europe. I get the CHL's rules and why they insist on it, but I don't think it helps some of these prospects at all to play down there when they really need to be somewhere in between the CHL and NHL.
 

Ararana

Registered User
Sep 22, 2013
17,668
27,583
Two Rivers
So when he comes to camp next year and still isn't used to NHL play, does he go back to juniors again?

I’m sure he’ll be so ready for the NHL after he tears up the same level of competition for the second time. That’s how this works right?

At least he’ll get a month of competitive play at WJCs.

I would've loved to loan him to SC Bern, but Byram doesn't seem like the type of bloke who would want to do that.

Playing on big ice wouldn’t worry you there?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AvsWraith

avsfan09

Registered User
Dec 17, 2010
7,089
3,262
Nova Scotia
Imagine to be able to ease Girard into the line up, let Makar make his debut during the playoffs, have Timmins waiting to go and on top of that can afford to send Byram back.

And still have guys like EJ, Cole and Zadorov around.
Exactly. His demotion is about our depth for once rather than him not being capable.
 

McMetal

Writer of Wrongs
Sep 29, 2015
14,142
12,130
Forgive the ignorance, but what makes him ineligible? His age?
The CHL and NHL have an agreement wherein drafted prospects from the CHL have to play in either the NHL or the CHL, no AHL time. It has to do with the CHL's desire to keep their star players in their own system to sell tickets rather than lose them to a different development league. And since CHL players aren't eligible for the NCAA (they're considered "professional" :facepalm:), that basically means they're stuck there unless they're full time in the NHL.

Europe is technically an option, as a loophole in the agreement, but in practice that never happens.

Count me in as saying that Byram will benefit very little from more WHL play. He already benefits too much offensively from the lack of structure down there; he won't learn NHL style offense at all in that setting. And his defensive game is already quite well developed at that level also, I don't see how he's going to develop much more in that area either against WHL talent. It sucks that he's caught in no man's land due to that agreement, because a year in the AHL would be perfect for him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad