That'll improve once Lindholm is claimed on waivers
I'd agree but nobody is taking Lindholm on waivers.
That'll improve once Lindholm is claimed on waivers
I agree where you're coming from BD, but the thing is McAvoy has yet to play a full healthy season without missing some games. He is now being counted on for the first time in his career to be THE guy, I think it makes sense to manage his minutes a bit to start at least - if the PK or PP faulters he will be the first guy on the list to be stepping in.If McAvoy goes down for any extended period, it will be hard to overcome.
I've said before I'm not a fan of Gryz on PP Unit 1. I don't think he has the offensive chops to succeed in that role, especially given how reliant the Bruins are on the 1st unit being successful. I want my best offensive D-man on that unit, and to me that's McAvoy and it's not even close.
Maybe I'm just old-school and don't like micro-managing a skater's minutes and if I'm a coach and I have a clear-cut No.1 D man on my team, I'm rolling that guy out there as often as possible in all situations.
Yet Frank Seravelli in his 31 predictions has the B's missing the playoffs, hope he is wrong.Agreed coach 100%
Yet Frank Seravelli in his 31 predictions has the B's missing the playoffs, hope he is wrong.
Yeah don't really hate the guy, but he does come off as the type to throw crap against the wall to see if it sticks, I don't think of him anything like some others that seem to know their stuff.He's a Habs fan , f*** him . He should call it dumb predictions not bold.
Most bold predictions don't pan out, that's why they're called bold predictions. Otherwise they'd be called likely predictions.
I don't get this mentality. So Gryz will be 2nd pair, on the PK, and on the 1st unit PP. Meanwhile your No.1 D-man in McAvoy won't kill penalties and is 2nd unit PP (which gets roughly 35% of the PP time after Unit 1).
To me, it makes more sense to have either McAvoy killing penalties and on PP 2, or have him on PP 1 if he's not on the PK.
Me, I'd have him on PP 1 and kill penalties. He's suppose to be a top end No.1 D-man for a reason. I'd be hitching my wagon to that horse if I'm Cassidy. Why reduce your No.1 D-man (by far IMO) to basically only even strength play?
I don't get this mentality. So Gryz will be 2nd pair, on the PK, and on the 1st unit PP. Meanwhile your No.1 D-man in McAvoy won't kill penalties and is 2nd unit PP (which gets roughly 35% of the PP time after Unit 1).
To me, it makes more sense to have either McAvoy killing penalties and on PP 2, or have him on PP 1 if he's not on the PK.
Me, I'd have him on PP 1 and kill penalties. He's suppose to be a top end No.1 D-man for a reason. I'd be hitching my wagon to that horse if I'm Cassidy. Why reduce your No.1 D-man (by far IMO) to basically only even strength play?
I still enjoy that on rerun but I hate that they cut down each show. Also, although I understand why she "pulled her ear to signal to her kids" and the Tarzan Call that she did was repetitious and goofballish... Tim Conway, Vicki Lawrence, Lyle Waggoner, and Harvey Korman were incredibly talented.
"As The Stomach Turns" is/was classic TV!
In comparison to whom?
Yet Frank Seravelli in his 31 predictions has the B's missing the playoffs, hope he is wrong.
Cassidy needs to divide PP time more evenly between the 2 PP units. It has been lopsided in favor of PP team #1 for a long time.
Yet Frank Seravelli in his 31 predictions has the B's missing the playoffs, hope he is wrong.
Who's currently projected to play on that 2nd unit?
Good question, I don't know.
Sorry...I dont know hw it started.. Doesnt take Much,,LOL. Sorry.Time to take your Sweeney talk to the Sweeney thread.
OK, well I had assumed McAvoy would be PK1 if he was not on the PP. So do they keep Griz and Carlo as PK1? In they past they had no problems mixing pairs on the PK, so I wonder if Miller/Carlo would be an option as PK1 if they are the best PK tandem. Griz/Lauzon as PK2? hmmmCassidy said PK will be a combination of Carlo, Gryz, Miler and Lauzon. Said Lauzon "has to kill penalties if he's gong to play there." Also said he'd like to rest McAvoy a bit on PK's so they don't wear him out.
Daily Faceoff currently has Smith,Coyle,Kas Mcavoy and Krecji. While Left Eing Lock has Debrusk, Richie, Kase, Smith Mcavoy.Who's currently projected to play on that 2nd unit?
doesnt really matter for the first 56 games seeing we dont play any off those teams. come trade deadline you can make a deal if needed.To the Leafs of course....
Thornton, Spezza, Simmonds.....you could call them the Demolitions!
Yet Frank Seravelli in his 31 predictions has the B's missing the playoffs, hope he is wrong.
Lightning? Avalanche? Leafs? Our Stanley Cup, awards picks
Stanley Cup champion
The new playoff format -- where the final four is re-seeded by regular season points percentage -- could yield some "dream matchups" in the Cup Final. Here are our picks for the eventual champ:
Sean Allen: Avalanche
Ben Arledge: Golden Knights
Pierre Becquey: Maple Leafs
Sachin Chandan: Bruins
Linda Cohn: Golden Knights
Dimitri Filipovic: Avalanche
Emily Kaplan: Capitals
Tim Kavanagh: Golden Knights
Don La Greca: Avalanche
Victoria Matiash: Avalanche
Barry Melrose: Avalanche
Arda Ocal: Maple Leafs
Chris Peters: Golden Knights
Greg Wyshynski: Maple Leafs
Sachin Chandan whoever that is certainly thinks so also
Who's currently projected to play on that 2nd unit?
Lightning? Avalanche? Leafs? Our Stanley Cup, awards picks
Stanley Cup champion
The new playoff format -- where the final four is re-seeded by regular season points percentage -- could yield some "dream matchups" in the Cup Final. Here are our picks for the eventual champ:
Sean Allen: Avalanche
Ben Arledge: Golden Knights
Pierre Becquey: Maple Leafs
Sachin Chandan: Bruins
Linda Cohn: Golden Knights
Dimitri Filipovic: Avalanche
Emily Kaplan: Capitals
Tim Kavanagh: Golden Knights
Don La Greca: Avalanche
Victoria Matiash: Avalanche
Barry Melrose: Avalanche
Arda Ocal: Maple Leafs
Chris Peters: Golden Knights
Greg Wyshynski: Maple Leafs
Sachin Chandan whoever that is certainly thinks so also