bleedblue1223
Registered User
- Jan 21, 2011
- 51,911
- 14,888
Do we think Wilkens has taken over the Colts backfield?
I would take Dobbins, but I'd also temper expectations. There will never be a feature back in Baltimore IMO, and when everyone is healthy, there are basically 4 backs there. Jackson doesn't tend to check down to the backs either. He does have big time upside though.Dobbins over Wilkins on waiver wire I would assume?
IMO, you're giving up too much. 2 RB1s and a WR1 for a (better) RB1 and flex options. Upgrade to Cook isn't worth what you're giving up.Prob a dumb question, is this even close? Ten teams, 0.5 PPR.
I get: Dalvin Cook, Justin Jackson, Brandin Cooks.
I give: Nick Chub , James Connor, Keenan Allen
You are giving too much up, but since it's 10 team, you could have disgusting depth, where moves like this make sense to get the best possible starting lineup for the playoffs. If you have insane depth, do what it takes to get Cook. If you don't have that depth, and you are losing 3 starters and don't have good replacements, then I'd pass.Prob a dumb question, is this even close? Ten teams, 0.5 PPR.
I get: Dalvin Cook, Justin Jackson, Brandin Cooks.
I give: Nick Chub , James Connor, Keenan Allen
Traded Edmonds for Woods, so now my setup is this:
RB: Zeke, Robinson, Carson, Moss, Wilkens, Gaskin
WR: Metcalf, Diggs, Woods, Jefferson
Would you consider Zeke and Jefferson for Robinson and Gurley. Or would that lean me to far towards WR and not be worth it? Had a deal being discussed with that owner, but I decided to float Edmonds to the Drake owner who is desperate for a win to make the playoffs, started with Higgins and he countered with Woods.
Quick and dirty, which would you rather have ROS, PPR:
Jonathan Taylor & Jordan Wilkins
Zack Moss & Devin Singletary
My concern with Gurley is his terrible yards per carry and non-existent passing game impactk, so he's TD dependent, but maybe there isn't a reason the TDs should stop.I'd rather have Robinson (Allen?) and Gurley. Feel like this isn't gonna be Zeke's year and have a poor ROS outlook on Dallas. Gurley has been quietly efficient and probably give you more than what Zeke will every week ROS. I hate that ARob has to rely on Foles, hoping the change in play calling leads to better things. And Chicago's playoff schedule is mint. For what it's worth, I'm an ARob owner.
My concern with Gurley is his terrible yards per carry and non-existent passing game impactk, so he's TD dependent, but maybe there isn't a reason the TDs should stop.
If you own Gaskin, do you go all in on Ahmed with waiver priority or FAAB to ensure that you get whoever is the starter there or do you trust that Gaskin gets his role back and you save waiver/FAAB for the possibility of someone else for the playoffs?
I do, I just haven't decided if I want to make sure I don't lose that backfield and then just add handcuffs and wait for an injury or pass on Ahmed and wait for an injury to happen somwhere else.Gaskins will get his role back as soon as he is ready to go. If you own Gaskins I would def pick up Ahmed in case his injury reoccurs or if they extend Gaskins recovery timeline. Unless you have the RB slots easily covered with your roster.
Todd Gurley's touchdown regression is coming.
Is it possible for the commish to change the trade deadline mid-season in a Yahoo league?
I've never commish'd a league, but I swore our deadline had already passed after week8, but then I noticed our Commish swung a trade with his dad (pretty lopsided trade at that: Baker Mayfield for Marqise Brown in a 2QB league).
Thanks for the info. I knew I wasn't crazy...On the league page (website version) it will tell you changes made by the commish under transactions and message board. I believe default Yahoo deadline was the 14th
But to your question, I believe you can change it at any point. I'm co-commish in a league and it still has the trade deadline as a drop down box like I can change it. Gives the options of 10/31, 11/7, 11/14, 11/21, 11/28 and no trade deadline
Check the change notes to see if or when it was changed