Would you do...
Moore, Vaak and a 1st
for
Ekman-Larsson with $2.5m retained.
I look at it as Vaak for Ekman-Larsson, and a 1st for them to take on Moore. Plus, they could use Moore as insurance because 5 of their 6 remaining defensemen are UFA's at the end of the year. We add $3m which puts us at the cap, they shed $3m which gets them just under the cap.
Marchand - Bergy - Pasta
DeBrusk - Krejci - Kase
Bjork - Coyle - Smith
Ritchie - Kuraly - Wagner
Grzelcyk - McAvoy
OEL - Carlo
Lauzon - Clifton
Does OEL make the B's a contender? Enough to lose one of DeBrusk/Gryz to Seattle in the expansion draft?
I don't think they can afford to do that.
Think about it this way:
If they made that move they are now out:
2017 1st rounder - Vaak
2018 1st rounder - Nash deal
2018 2nd rounder - Axel Andersson in Backes deal
2019 2nd rounder - Johansson deal
2020 1st rounder - Backes deal
2021/22 1st rounder
So let's assume the 1st rounder is a 2022 pick. Now your out 4 out of 6 1st round picks, and 2 out of 6 2nd rounders from the past 6 drafts, essentially one half of your total, or an average of one Top 60 pick gone per year.
This from a franchise that has only had 14 picks in the past 3 drafts total, and has gone all-in on longer-term prospects by heavily dipping into the USHL/NCAA prospect pool.
And without or without OEL, they are going to lose a decent player to Seattle, no two ways about it.
At some point the Bruins have to stop mortgaging the future so they can hopefully take advantage of having Pasta and McAvoy in their primes in ages 25-28. From my vantage point the past 3 drafts due to the lack of picks and honestly some of the players chosen (specifically ignoring the CHL), are going to create a gap in the prospect pool down the road. After stockpiling picks for the 2015 draft, the Sweeney administration has traded away a quite a number of draft picks, young players and prospects either on rental players or to shed bad contracts.