Prospect Info: 2020-2021 Prospects Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bryanbryoil

Pray For Ukraine
Sep 13, 2004
86,205
34,675
If this were true someone would've signed him by now IMO. If we let his rights expire without even attempting to sign him that would be a fireable offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reginald Dunlop

BarDownBobo

Registered User
Oct 19, 2012
6,445
3,094
City of Champions
We drafted him 2 years ago. We have him for 4 years. Who is this puckpedia tool?
He’s in a weird situation because he was drafted out of North America, playing in the USHL that year. CHL players only have their rights for 2 years post draft, but Euros is 4. But since he went back it’s confusing if it’s 2 or 4 years they’d have him for.
 

McTonyBrar

Registered User
Apr 2, 2018
18,489
19,324
He’s in a weird situation because he was drafted out of North America, playing in the USHL that year. CHL players only have their rights for 2 years post draft, but Euros is 4. But since he went back it’s confusing if it’s 2 or 4 years they’d have him for.
Apparently we don’t have his rights anymore. Why didn’t Holland sign him!?
 

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
41,683
30,134
Ontario
If this were true someone would've signed him by now IMO. If we let his rights expire without even attempting to sign him that would be a fireable offense.

I’m not sure if him being drafted at 19 changes anything, but normally they’d have to re-enter the draft, so they can’t be signed by someone else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bryanbryoil

belair

Jay Woodcroft Unemployment Stance
Apr 9, 2010
38,651
21,850
Canada
I’m not sure if him being drafted at 19 changes anything, but normally they’d have to re-enter the draft, so they can’t be signed by someone else.
We might have to re-draft him if we accidentally missed the signing deadline.
 

Beerfish

Registered User
Apr 14, 2007
19,513
5,665
Traded away a lot of our picks.
Few good legit prospect forwards.
Lets one of the few guys that give a bit of prospect optimism, walk for free it seems?

Solid team building.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bryanbryoil

CupofOil

Knob Flavored Coffey
Aug 20, 2009
46,890
40,925
NYC
I don't get this, at all. Say what you want about Holland but he's very thorough and I highly doubt that he'd misinterpret this rule. To let a promising prospect go for no reason doesn't make sense to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GOilers88

North

Registered User
Jun 25, 2009
15,697
13,298
I don't get this, at all. Say what you want about Holland but he's very thorough and I highly doubt that he'd misinterpret this rule. To let a promising prospect go for no reason doesn't make sense to me.

It’s just a very weird situation. Hopefully one of the media guys can dig a little deeper and find out what happened.
 

CycloneSweep

Registered User
Sep 27, 2017
48,326
40,120
I don't get this, at all. Say what you want about Holland but he's very thorough and I highly doubt that he'd misinterpret this rule. To let a promising prospect go for no reason doesn't make sense to me.
I do wonder if the date got moved and no one has been clear on it.

Maybe they are working on a deal, who knows.
 

CupofOil

Knob Flavored Coffey
Aug 20, 2009
46,890
40,925
NYC
It’s just a very weird situation. Hopefully one of the media guys can dig a little deeper and find out what happened.

Stauffer hasn't mentioned him, ever, as far as I know. He probably doesn't know or care that it happened since Blumel isn't Canadian.
 
  • Like
Reactions: North

McTonyBrar

Registered User
Apr 2, 2018
18,489
19,324
I don't get this, at all. Say what you want about Holland but he's very thorough and I highly doubt that he'd misinterpret this rule. To let a promising prospect go for no reason doesn't make sense to me.

Apparently when we drafted Blumel, the plan was for him to go to NCAA. But, he decided not to and went to Czech Republic. I guess that brought his years down and we decided to let him go? I don't understand this
 

Senor Catface

Registered User
Jul 25, 2006
16,035
20,081
I honestly have no idea how it makes sense. He said that since Blumel didn't go to NCAA and went to Czech Republic, we decided not to sign him... How does that make sense?

Well if Stauffer is saying we didn't sign him, that solves that mystery.

I get there was a disconnect with where the Oilers wanted his career to go, but to just drop him?
 

North

Registered User
Jun 25, 2009
15,697
13,298
I honestly have no idea how it makes sense. He said that since Blumel didn't go to NCAA and went to Czech Republic, we decided not to sign him... How does that make sense?

That’s weird… I guess they wanted more time before having to give him a contract, but I mean he earned one in my opinion.
 

Senor Catface

Registered User
Jul 25, 2006
16,035
20,081
That’s weird… I guess they wanted more time before having to give him a contract, but I mean he earned one in my opinion.

Maybe it was a situation where he didn't want to play overseas/North America?

Like you said, very odd.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad