Transfer: 2019 Winter Transfer Rumors and Discussion Part III

Discussion in 'Soccer' started by Halladay, Jan 28, 2019.

  1. Il Mediano

    Il Mediano Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2018
    Messages:
    1,837
    Likes Received:
    686
    Trophy Points:
    84
  2. Creed Bratton

    Creed Bratton Registered User

    Joined:
    May 18, 2016
    Messages:
    7,452
    Likes Received:
    916
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Occupation:
    Biznus
    I really like Foyth. Incredibly "smooth" for a centre-half. Didn't watch his games for Argentina but he was MOTM in his debut.

    Here's to hoping that he doesn't have too many Chiriches moments because of his overconfidence.
     
    spintheblackcircle likes this.
  3. bleedblue1223

    bleedblue1223 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Messages:
    38,966
    Likes Received:
    3,980
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Well, Sarri won't get much improvement or it's not going to be a desirable job for a replacement.

    An appeal should allow for transfers this summer though, so should be busy.
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2019
  4. kyle evs48

    kyle evs48 Devilish Boy Grin

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    Messages:
    35,540
    Likes Received:
    1,146
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Location:
    New York, NY
    No matter.

     
  5. bleedblue1223

    bleedblue1223 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Messages:
    38,966
    Likes Received:
    3,980
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Obviously Pulisic, but would finally be nice to integrate guys like Abraham, Mount, James, Hudson-Odoi, Loftus-Cheek, Ampadu. That's the silver linging. Use the appeal to upgrade some of the starting 11, and have youth take up the depth and get more minutes.
     
  6. hatterson

    hatterson Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2010
    Messages:
    22,482
    Likes Received:
    2,484
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Occupation:
    Software Developer
    Location:
    North Tonawanda, NY
    You mean use the appeal time to buy 6 more 29 year old players and then continue to let the young players rot until they leave...right?
     
    Evilo likes this.
  7. bleedblue1223

    bleedblue1223 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Messages:
    38,966
    Likes Received:
    3,980
    Trophy Points:
    157
    That is the Chelsea method.

    The way I envision it, Hazard forces his move and between that and the ban, teams will demand crazy high prices, so we really won't buy too much quantity, and that'll leave minutes for some of the youth. Worst case is the above, teams demand high prices and we panic and overpay for Drinkwater and Zappacosta types. Best case, this move forces us to use Hudson-Odoi and it convinces him to stay.
     
  8. Ivan13

    Ivan13 Super Joe!

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    25,535
    Likes Received:
    5,927
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Zagreb, Croatia
    For the life of me, I don't understand kids who sign with that club.
     
  9. bleedblue1223

    bleedblue1223 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Messages:
    38,966
    Likes Received:
    3,980
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Money. We also don't really sign any of the star young players. Lukaku was someone a lot of teams wanted, but even De Bruyne and Salah were under the radar. None of the real youth players have become much when they moved elsewhere.
     
  10. hatterson

    hatterson Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2010
    Messages:
    22,482
    Likes Received:
    2,484
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Occupation:
    Software Developer
    Location:
    North Tonawanda, NY
    They get to play for a top club, get loaned out, play well, and then make a move. It's not like Chelsea is signing them to a 6 year deal when they're 20 and letting them rot their careers away.
     
  11. Ivan13

    Ivan13 Super Joe!

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    25,535
    Likes Received:
    5,927
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Zagreb, Croatia
    The reason for them not becoming much is because they were moved away from a nurturing environment and moved around Europe without any plan or method to the madness. It's just people around those kids being greedy as hell and ruining the kid's career before it ever started, completely missing out on the big picture. Stay with your parent club, then move to a mid-table club in say Germany (like Eintracht or something liek that) and prove your worth there. Modrić did it right, Rakitić did it right, Pjaca messed it up, so did Kovačić, Rebić almost ruined his career because he moved to Fiorentina before he was ready, Halilović messed it up, and then you have pašalić and Delač who were both ruined by Chelsea loaning them left and right ...
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2019
    Havre likes this.
  12. bleedblue1223

    bleedblue1223 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Messages:
    38,966
    Likes Received:
    3,980
    Trophy Points:
    157
    This might be the case sometimes, and a lot of times, the players just aren't as good as their potential indicated at an earlier age. A lot of Chelsea's loans are to stable places that matches their ability level, Lukaku, De Bruyne, Salah, Courtois, and Christensen all developed successfully in it. Van Ginkel was making his way to a successful career before injuries hit again. And then you have guys like Bertrand Traore, and while he didn't fail, he was definitely overhyped.
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2019
    The Zetterberg Era likes this.
  13. Evilo

    Evilo Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2002
    Messages:
    45,304
    Likes Received:
    2,463
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Location:
    France
    Kakuta was widely considered as the class of his birth year.
    I saw him play at 17. Then I saw him play at 19. Not only he didn't progress at all, but he regressed. That's what moving from Lens to Chelsea's loaning teams did to him.
     
  14. bleedblue1223

    bleedblue1223 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Messages:
    38,966
    Likes Received:
    3,980
    Trophy Points:
    157
    There are many reasons for why youth don't progress though or regress. Yes, limited playing time is an issue, but there are plenty of fail even though they are giving plenty of time in a good situation.

    For the record, I wouldn't advise a youth to go to Chelsea, but we shouldn't act like all of the failed youth that went to Chelsea would've fulfilled their potential if they went elsewhere.
     
  15. Havre

    Havre Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Messages:
    4,706
    Likes Received:
    714
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Not sure how much credit Chelsea can get for players like Lukaku, Salah and KDB.

    I remember Salah from Basel when Spurs played them in the EL. Rarely do you thing “who is this” when you are playing a “small” club in the EL, but then I did. Could just as well argue he would have been even better if Chelsea didn’t buy him.

    Similar story with Lukaku and KDB.

    Considering the “scattergun”’approach from Chelsea I think the success rate is ridiculously low.

    It is their way though. And that part of isn’t illegal so I don’t mind, but unless they are making money from it then it can hardly be said to be successful (strangely enough many of these “failed” youngsters still get bought by smaller teams for surprisingly high fees. I know Spurs best and they have sold so many decent, but not good players for astronomical fees).
     
  16. bleedblue1223

    bleedblue1223 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Messages:
    38,966
    Likes Received:
    3,980
    Trophy Points:
    157
    I'm not giving Chelsea credit for it, just that the loan system doesn't automatically ruin a career like some imply. What I'm saying is, Chelsea signs as many youth as possible and most will fail because most players don't become stars. Since Chelsea aren't known for developing youth, they usually aren't signing the top youth players that will develop into stars.

    The loan system worked great for many of those players. Salah had 1 "lost" season with 501 minutes of Premier League time, not counting cup time. De Bruyne never had a lost season. Lukaku had a lost season in 11/12. Besides that, those players never had a negative year on their development.

    The loan system is more of a revenue generator and FFP compliance tool than a development tool for the senior squad.
     
    The Zetterberg Era likes this.
  17. JeffreyLFC

    JeffreyLFC Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2017
    Messages:
    1,975
    Likes Received:
    1,225
    Trophy Points:
    84
    Gender:
    Male
    I actually admire Chelsea scouting network.

    They discovered/recruited some of the best talent in the world with Salah, De bruyne, Courtois, Lukaku, Christensen.

    That being said, I don't like at all how thet develop their players and from memory the only young player they played with the first team in a key role was Eden Hazard. All the other were not given a key role and eventually moved out by loan.
     
  18. Havre

    Havre Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Messages:
    4,706
    Likes Received:
    714
    Trophy Points:
    109
    The last part of it is my take as well.

    You might argue they didn’t have any “lost seasons”, but compared to what? All of those players could have been playing in vital roles for a good first team somewhere instead. Don’t get me wrong. All teams do that (picking up players that might have developed better at a different team), but none are as extreme as Chelsea.

    To me they are ruining careers, but I don’t blame Chelsea for that. It is up to the players if they want to be part of what is generally speaking not producing much other than maybe profits for Chelsea.
     
  19. bleedblue1223

    bleedblue1223 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Messages:
    38,966
    Likes Received:
    3,980
    Trophy Points:
    157
    They were playing for vital roles on good teams. Courtois at Atletico, Lukaku at West Brom and Everton, De Bruyne at Werder Bremen, Salah at Fiorentina and Roma.
     
  20. bleedblue1223

    bleedblue1223 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Messages:
    38,966
    Likes Received:
    3,980
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Hazard and Oscar were given big roles early, Hazard was already sort of proven though. De Bruyne was the one that hurt because he was given time early in the season and then Mourinho ruined it.
     
  21. phisherman

    phisherman Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2015
    Messages:
    1,709
    Likes Received:
    348
    Trophy Points:
    79
    Chelsea's youth policy is to make money off the youth players to pay back Abramovich's loan to the club.
     
  22. Havre

    Havre Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Messages:
    4,706
    Likes Received:
    714
    Trophy Points:
    109
    A couple of those were very highly touted young players before Chelsea bought them. Lukaku especially had little to do with scouting. Courtois
    the same. I can’t remember Christensen, but Salah and De Bruyne were hardly unknowns either. Difference was some years ago Chelsea was among “the” clubs to go to. Probably not true in the same way today.

    And you are kind of bound to hit something when you buy as many as they do. I mean at the time Cuortois was bought that sum would be considered a fairly big investment for many even mid level PL teams. Buy 50 of those (I’m exaggerating) and something got to work out. It’s a bit like having 15 2nd round picks every year.
     
  23. East Coast Bias

    East Coast Bias Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2014
    Messages:
    4,869
    Likes Received:
    2,449
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Location:
    NYC
    You can take Lukaku back. Discount rate. Transfer ban special, everything must go!
     
    hatterson likes this.
  24. Havre

    Havre Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Messages:
    4,706
    Likes Received:
    714
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Courtois I agree. Obviously I don’t know the inner workings here, but he seemed to be groomed by Chelsea for a role at Chelsea.

    The rest seems just as random as all the other players Chelsea send out. Some will swim because they are just that talented.

    Anyway. We seem to agree. I don’t think loaning players out like that will ruin every career. And it doesn’t seem like you think it is a very good idea for developing them either.
     
  25. bleedblue1223

    bleedblue1223 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Messages:
    38,966
    Likes Received:
    3,980
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Salah, De Bruyne, and Courtois were pretty much unknowns. They were discovered by scouts and convinced to buy when we played against them in Europe. Prices were a bit lower back then, but none of them cost that much, Lukaku was the only one with real competition and a bidding war.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"