Christien
Registered User
- May 1, 2010
- 5,145
- 3,542
Podkolzin simply cannot keep up with fast paced game. USA going to destroy Russia. So it s Zegras or Turcotte , maybe pay attention to #11 Nicolaev, probably available in the second roundBig game tomorrow morning: USA Vs Russia. It's going to be on NHL Network at 9:30 AM for anyone wanting to get a good look at Podkolzin, Turcotte, Zegras etc.
You know, they say that stats don't tell the whole story on prospects and I think that's true about stats, but stats can tell part of the story. What I think Podkolzin's IIHF U18 numbers are telling us is that if he reaches potential, it probably won't be relatively soon.So Russia beat Slovakia 6-3 and Podkolzin just wasn't involved at all in the scoring? Hmm.
I want us to draft Zegras really badly and I think he's exactly what we need if we can't get Byram. I haven't been able to watch a whole lot of Podkolzin, but I was able to watch him play in the U20s and I thought he was pretty good and made some smart plays. I just think he's such an unknown and a lot of people haven't seen him play much, including myself, but a lot of the "experts" really like him so it's interesting. Looking forward to watching him play in the game this morning.Podkolzin simply cannot keep up with fast paced game. USA going to destroy Russia. So it s Zegras or Turcotte , maybe pay attention to #11 Nicolaev, probably available in the second round
There's just so many good centers in this draft and everybody wants oneI would also add that Podkolzin really isn't the same as the Zadina situation. Zadina's potential was seen as high, plus his numbers in QMJHL demonstrated some of his capability. His numbers, insticts and his skills hinted at elite talent. I think if it wasn't for the combine, he wouldn't have fallen to 6th. At the combine teams saw that he was going to need a bit more development than previously estimated, particularly with physicality. So, he fell to us.
With Podkolzin, it's harder to tell. He may very well slip to 9th or 10th.
Kind of strange .Podkolzin>Zadina, but still probably like you said going to be picked 9or10. Hockey has changed, we need to stay in trendI would also add that Podkolzin really isn't the same as the Zadina situation. Zadina's potential was seen as high, plus his numbers in QMJHL demonstrated some of his capability. His numbers, insticts and his skills hinted at elite talent. I think if it wasn't for the combine, he wouldn't have fallen to 6th. At the combine teams saw that he was going to need a bit more development than previously estimated, particularly with physicality. So, he fell to us.
With Podkolzin, it's harder to tell. He may very well slip to 9th or 10th.
This tournament is my first experience watching some of these prospects and I like this Zegras kid a lot. I feel like I notice him every time he's on the ice. Why didn't he play in the first couple of games?
Also, this Russian goalie seems really good.
I love watching Zegras on the powerplay. Such a treat.
If somebody gave me a million dollars, and my only two options were to either bet it all on Zadina having a great NHL career, or to bet it all on Podkolzin having a great NHL career...Kind of strange .Podkolzin>Zadina, but still probably like you said going to be picked 9or10. Hockey has changed, we need to stay in trend
Kind of strange .Podkolzin>Zadina, but still probably like you said going to be picked 9or10. Hockey has changed, we need to stay in trend
It's bizarre, but it could be any number of things. A minor injury, just hitting a cold streak, or even feeling the pressure of final evaluations before the draft.I need some kind of an explanation for Podkolzin with this tournament.
He’s very much been a non-factor. How are you the #3 player and a non-factor in a tournament you dominated last year?
I need some kind of an explanation for Podkolzin with this tournament.
He’s very much been a non-factor. How are you the #3 player and a non-factor in a tournament you dominated last year?
I think it's just part of the variability of the tourney, especially given the small number of games played if a player gets hot or cold it becomes really noticeable. Look at Maxim Cajkovic last year, he had 11 points in 5 games, this year just 5 in 5. The U18 is littered with guys that had fantastic scoring tournaments but just got hot, as well as those that were cold but still developed into good NHLers.
I know there's more to it than stat watching, but I think there's a real problem with some players who get over/under drafted based off of their U-18 performances. Mind you, given Podkolzin's play in his domestic leagues this year he really did need to have a very productive tournament to justify being the "consensus" #3.
This goalie is an under ager for Russia?
He's 16, turns 17 in June.
Insane level of poise in this moment for a 16 year old