Rumor: 2019-2020 Trade Rumours and Free Agent Discussion Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.

cgf

FireBednarsSuccessor
Oct 15, 2010
60,368
19,220
w/ Renly's Peach
So... firsts in the 20s don't bring in A level prospects or even fringe A level guys. They are solid B level prospects. Our 1sts have that sort of value. The pool was top 5 with Makar and Byram... take those two out and I think you have a hard time arguing it is a top 10, maybe even top 15 pool. You'd have Newhook as the top guy with Timmins, Kaut, and Bowers following him. Not a single A level prospect in the batch. Newhook is fringe the rest are B (Timmins can claw his way up).

Now that package is a late 1st + A/B level prospect + B level prospect + reclamation project. Take a team like Florida... you get a better 1st, then they can throw in at least two prospects at the Newhook level (choose two of Denisenko, Tippet, Knight) and they can throw in Borgstrom as their 'reclamation.' Plenty of teams have A or A/B level prospect to toss into a deal and have better picks available.

So what you're saying is...we need to convince the Panthros to trade us Deni & Tippett for Newhook & Kaut?
 

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Sponsor
Feb 24, 2012
62,800
46,875
Please fill me in on the type of futures package these teams can put together that the Avs can’t top.

Dallas has Harley, Dellandrea, and picks
Stl has Kyrou, Kostin, and more picks than the Avs (worse value on 1sts)
Nashville has Tomasino, Tolvanen and more picks than the Avs (similar value on 1sts)
 

cgf

FireBednarsSuccessor
Oct 15, 2010
60,368
19,220
w/ Renly's Peach
Please fill me in on the type of futures package these teams can put together that the Avs can’t top.

Was just riffing on the 'every former av or big name ends up in the central' meme...not seriously suggesting that those specific teams a) have a legit A-prospect to beat our best non-Byram offer, or b) would be willing to give said legit A-prospect up.

Though, as Henchy mentioned, the Stars could be our huckleberry here if they wanted to...though I dunno if they feel like they need a big addition or a couple of supporting-cast upgrades, to take off.
 

Cousin Eddie

You Serious Clark?
Nov 3, 2006
40,152
37,330
Dallas has Harley, Dellandrea, and picks
Stl has Kyrou, Kostin, and more picks than the Avs (worse value on 1sts)
Nashville has Tomasino, Tolvanen and more picks than the Avs (similar value on 1sts)
Yeah Harley can’t be topped. I never even considered him since I’d peg him as untouchable as Byram. If they are willing to trade Harley, Hall should be theirs.

As for St. Louis and Nashville, we can top this episode offers quite easily. Especially when you consider the salary maneuvering those teams would have to do. Nashville has Josi’e contract kicking in next year. Turris would have to be part of it which brings value way down. St. Louis has Petro, Faulk and Schenn all with hefty increases next year (unless they move on from their captain). Kreider as a rental is much more likely there.
 

cgf

FireBednarsSuccessor
Oct 15, 2010
60,368
19,220
w/ Renly's Peach
I'd take Deni alone for Newhook and Kaut...

Touche lol. He wouldn't solve anything for us this year -- or next year, probably -- but in that timeline; Bednar would absolutely adore him whenever he was ready for the NHL. That speed & commitment on the forecheck + those hands *drools*...I'm still convinced he's a better prospect than Kravtsov was & he's the russian forward who should've been a top 10 pick that year.
 

Bubba Thudd

is getting banned
Jul 19, 2005
24,571
4,666
Avaland
So... firsts in the 20s don't bring in A level prospects or even fringe A level guys. They are solid B level prospects. Our 1sts have that sort of value. The pool was top 5 with Makar and Byram... take those two out and I think you have a hard time arguing it is a top 10, maybe even top 15 pool. You'd have Newhook as the top guy with Timmins, Kaut, and Bowers following him. Not a single A level prospect in the batch. Newhook is fringe the rest are B (Timmins can claw his way up).

Now that package is a late 1st + A/B level prospect + B level prospect + reclamation project. Take a team like Florida... you get a better 1st, then they can throw in at least two prospects at the Newhook level (choose two of Denisenko, Tippet, Knight) and they can throw in Borgstrom as their 'reclamation.' Plenty of teams have A or A/B level prospect to toss into a deal and have better picks available.

Does Hall have any kind of Movement Clause?
 

Cousin Eddie

You Serious Clark?
Nov 3, 2006
40,152
37,330
Was just riffing on the 'every former av or big name ends up in the central' meme...not seriously suggesting that those specific teams a) have a legit A-prospect to beat our best non-Byram offer, or b) would be willing to give said legit A-prospect up.

Though, as Henchy mentioned, the Stars could be our huckleberry here if they wanted to...though I dunno if they feel like they need a big addition or a couple of supporting-cast upgrades, to take off.
Yeah if the Stars are willing to trade Harley we should just sit back, not overpay and enjoy the fact that he won’t be on the Stars blue line for the next decade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cgf

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
49,466
52,488
There's 0 chance that we trade the last 4OA pick for a rental. If that's what it takes then just too bad. Not like Hall is a great idea to begin with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: obZen

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
49,466
52,488
Remember when Ottawa couldn't get a young blue chip dman for rental EK? I remember.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shadow1

TruePowerSlave

Registered User
Jun 27, 2015
7,011
8,487
Hopefully, we don't give up a lot for someone that is not even here next season. If you need to make a move then fix the issue at least for a couple of seasons.
 

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Sponsor
Feb 24, 2012
62,800
46,875
Yeah Harley can’t be topped. I never even considered him since I’d peg him as untouchable as Byram. If they are willing to trade Harley, Hall should be theirs.

As for St. Louis and Nashville, we can top this episode offers quite easily. Especially when you consider the salary maneuvering those teams would have to do. Nashville has Josi’e contract kicking in next year. Turris would have to be part of it which brings value way down. St. Louis has Petro, Faulk and Schenn all with hefty increases next year (unless they move on from their captain). Kreider as a rental is much more likely there.

Dallas easily has the best opportunity to bid, not only for Hall, but anybody. Their top prospect is in an area of strength in their core.

St Louis is interesting to me, not that they'd have a hugely better or worse package than the Avs... but out of the Kyrou, Tomasino, and Newhook group, Kyrou is clearly the best prospect out of the three. When you get to the tier below that fit means as much as anything else IMO.

Nashville's group would be totally dependent on how they view Tolvanen. There is a player with a clear talent and some real fit issues with an organization and he has an attitude issue (which New Jersey seems unafraid to deal with attitude issues). Think the Avs' package is better there, but people are sleeping on Tomasino.

Does Hall have any kind of Movement Clause?
None are in his contract.
 

Cousin Eddie

You Serious Clark?
Nov 3, 2006
40,152
37,330
See Seth Jones trade...
Huh? That was a total hockey trade using two young future stars who were both expendable because of the depth of those positions on their respective teams.

This is a current star player who needs a new contract in a few months.
 

Cousin Eddie

You Serious Clark?
Nov 3, 2006
40,152
37,330
Goalie prospects don’t have crazy value by any means but I could see Annunen of extreme value for NJ. If Sakic was considering trading him I’d bet he’d want to wait until after the WJC where a hype train would hopefully begin.
 

cgf

FireBednarsSuccessor
Oct 15, 2010
60,368
19,220
w/ Renly's Peach
Goalie prospects don’t have crazy value by any means but I could see Annunen of extreme value for NJ. If Sakic was considering trading him I’d bet he’d want to wait until after the WJC where a hype train would hopefully begin.

Annunen could be a desireable piece, but he's still more of a B-prospect than an A...much less a bluechipper.

We actually have a good bit of second-tier ammo; which is why I think our best solution will be using multiple second-tier targets to bolster us where we need it, rather than banking on 1 big buy...unless that big buy was an elite blueliner in his prime...because Byram is our only really top-caliber ammo, and finding a deal worth moving him in would be really tricksy.
 

arun

Click here to hide this advertisement
Jun 23, 2016
2,087
1,705
Holland
Goalie prospects don’t have crazy value by any means but I could see Annunen of extreme value for NJ. If Sakic was considering trading him I’d bet he’d want to wait until after the WJC where a hype train would hopefully begin.
Wouldnt Luukkonen from Buf be their starter?
 

shadow1

Registered User
Nov 29, 2008
16,592
5,237
I don’t feel like Colorado needs to get into a bidding war for Hall. If there’s a deal that works, or money that works in the off-season, so be it.

But getting Hall when the Avs already have a great top line feels a bit Karlsson to the Sharks-esque to me.

Sounds great at first, but next thing you know you’re playing Tim Heed every night because you have no cap space left.
 

Cousin Eddie

You Serious Clark?
Nov 3, 2006
40,152
37,330
Annunen could be a desireable piece, but he's still more of a B-prospect than an A...much less a bluechipper.

We actually have a good bit of second-tier ammo; which is why I think our best solution will be using multiple second-tier targets to bolster us where we need it, rather than banking on 1 big buy...unless that big buy was an elite blueliner in his prime...because Byram is our only really top-caliber ammo, and finding a deal worth moving him in would be really tricksy.

Oh yeah he’d definitely be a secondary piece. But one they’d desire.

Wouldnt Luukkonen from Buf be their starter?
I would think Annunen is the better goalie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arun

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Sponsor
Feb 24, 2012
62,800
46,875
We actually have a good bit of second-tier ammo; which is why I think our best solution will be using multiple second-tier targets to bolster us where we need it, rather than banking on 1 big buy...unless that big buy was an elite blueliner in his prime...because Byram is our only really top-caliber ammo, and finding a deal worth moving him in would be really tricksy.

This is exactly how I feel... Avs have plenty of ammo to pull of the 2nd tier sorts of deals, but not a ton of the top tier sorts and that simply stems from Makar and Byram being no-gos.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad