BobRossColton
Registered User
When mikko is ready to play should we hold him out just one more game to truly help his healing or just go for it?
lol wtf?When mikko is ready to play should we hold him out just one more game to truly help his healing or just go for it?
You don’t subscribe? Shame.
For the record, my piece involved sleuthing around the Avs practice facility today with video. I’m not in Minnesota, AJ is.
The situations are different because the league makes it different. Having a ref down is less of an issue on gameplay that having a player down so the situations should be flipped if you want to get nitty gritty with it. But I’m not advocating that, let’s think of safety first and blow the whistle quickly when a player or ref is in distress.We all agree that the Calvert play should've been blown dead because of the seriousness of the injury. It was a mistake, and Bettman kinda admitted as much without directly saying it. However, it's not an apples-to-apples comparison with what happened to the ref last night. First of all, the ref did get hit in the head, and was clearly in a lot of pain. Just because he was able to return doesn't mean it wasn't serious at the time. It was the right decision to stop play. When a player get injured, the team has to gain possession of the puck to stop play (unless the injury is deemed serious). Obviously this doesn't apply to refs since they aren't a team and can't gain possession. Additionally, when the ref was injured, there wasn't a scoring opportunity taking place like in the Calvert situation. It has always been precedent that whenever a ref or linesman gets injured, the play is stopped right away, and that's the way it should be.
Let's just acknowledge that the refs made a mistake on the Calvert play and not try to compare the two situations because they're completely different.
We all agree that the Calvert play should've been blown dead because of the seriousness of the injury. It was a mistake, and Bettman kinda admitted as much without directly saying it. However, it's not an apples-to-apples comparison with what happened to the ref last night. First of all, the ref did get hit in the head, and was clearly in a lot of pain. Just because he was able to return doesn't mean it wasn't serious at the time. It was the right decision to stop play. When a player get injured, the team has to gain possession of the puck to stop play (unless the injury is deemed serious). Obviously this doesn't apply to refs since they aren't a team and can't gain possession. Additionally, when the ref was injured, there wasn't a scoring opportunity taking place like in the Calvert situation. It has always been precedent that whenever a ref or linesman gets injured, the play is stopped right away, and that's the way it should be.
Let's just acknowledge that the refs made a mistake on the Calvert play and not try to compare the two situations because they're completely different.
^ This is a somewhat sarcastic comment on the state of officiating. I do not condone shooting pucks at the officials on a regular basis. But once in a while...
When mikko is ready to play should we hold him out just one more game to truly help his healing or just go for it?
Ya he should definitely lay off the fights at least for a bit. He's too important we need him on the ice. The other stuff is just unlucky.I know Calvert's role is to be this madman jumping to puck head first but I am afraid for his health. He has taken some heavy hits, fights and puck.. It's going to leave a mark.
Bednar said he's going to start practising and working with Allard as soon as Monday/Tuesday.Great to hear Rants and Calvert are close.
Has anyone heard anything on Wilson? His injury seems the most mysterious.
You know that he died, right?Great to hear Rants and Calvert are close.
Has anyone heard anything on Wilson? His injury seems the most mysterious.
How much longer is Landy supposed to be out for
Yeah, except they're not completely different. In fact, they are very similar.We all agree that the Calvert play should've been blown dead because of the seriousness of the injury. It was a mistake, and Bettman kinda admitted as much without directly saying it. However, it's not an apples-to-apples comparison with what happened to the ref last night. First of all, the ref did get hit in the head, and was clearly in a lot of pain. Just because he was able to return doesn't mean it wasn't serious at the time. It was the right decision to stop play. When a player get injured, the team has to gain possession of the puck to stop play (unless the injury is deemed serious). Obviously this doesn't apply to refs since they aren't a team and can't gain possession. Additionally, when the ref was injured, there wasn't a scoring opportunity taking place like in the Calvert situation. It has always been precedent that whenever a ref or linesman gets injured, the play is stopped right away, and that's the way it should be.
Let's just acknowledge that the refs made a mistake on the Calvert play and not try to compare the two situations because they're completely different.