Safe to assume Makar is on the Avs next year?
Thanks guys
His own college coach said a little bit ago that it was time for him to take the next step. The only question now is: if we make the playoffs, do we sign Makar for that? Or perhaps will his season last longer than ours?Safe to assume Makar is on the Avs next year?
Thanks guys
His own college coach said a little bit ago that it was time for him to take the next step. The only question now is: if we make the playoffs, do we sign Makar for that? Or perhaps will his season last longer than ours?
His own college coach said a little bit ago that it was time for him to take the next step. The only question now is: if we make the playoffs, do we sign Makar for that? Or perhaps will his season last longer than ours?
We'll either be losing Compher or Jost anyway, barring something unlikely like an EJ buyout/waiving his NMC. There's not much we can do about it, my guess is if Makar is available for the playoffs, they sign him and worry about the rest later.Hopefully his season lasts longer than ours, having him exempt from the ED will be huge.
A lot can change over 3 years, but unless the team completely implodes having him exempt will save us from losing a quality player like Compher.
That would be a very dumb idea. They are better off letting the Eagles signing him to an ATO.We'll either be losing Compher or Jost anyway, barring something unlikely like an EJ buyout/waiving his NMC. There's not much we can do about it, my guess is if Makar is available for the playoffs, they sign him and worry about the rest later.
If playing him this season means we lose another good player during expanison than thats an incredibly dumb decision to make imoWe'll either be losing Compher or Jost anyway, barring something unlikely like an EJ buyout/waiving his NMC. There's not much we can do about it, my guess is if Makar is available for the playoffs, they sign him and worry about the rest later.
I'm saying we will lose a good player regardless, there's nothing we can do about that, so we may as well sign him. My guess is the front office feels that way.If playing him this season means we lose another good player during expanison than thats an incredibly dumb decision to make imo
Yes but it means we lose an extra player.I'm saying we will lose a good player regardless, there's nothing we can do about that, so we may as well sign him. My guess is the front office feels that way.
We can only lose one....Yes but it means we lose an extra player.
I'm saying we will lose a good player regardless, there's nothing we can do about that, so we may as well sign him. My guess is the front office feels that way.
The difference could be losing a 50 point player instead of a 30 point player for all we know. That's a huge difference for a team like the Avs who can't draft and develop worth ****. It could also be the difference between being able to go 7/3 instead of 4/4.
Yeah but if that means losing someone like Girard instead of the next guy in line it sucks. Not all losses are equal. We don't need to see Makar in the NHL this year.We can only lose one....
You say Girard, but you don't say the alternative that we will lose instead. Like I said, we will, full stop, lose a good player to the expansion draft. It may be Girard, it may be Compher, it may be Z, or Jost, or hypothetical UFA signing Mr. X. It will hurt. We got lucky last time at the XD, it won't spare us this time, whether we have to protect Makar or not.Yeah but if that means losing someone like Girard instead of the next guy in line it sucks. Not all losses are equal.
Exactly. Would you rather lose Girard or Compher? Can't act like it doesn't matter who we lose because we'll lose someone.You say Girard, but you don't say the alternative that we will lose instead. Like I said, we will, full stop, lose a good player to the expansion draft. It may be Girard, it may be Compher, it may be Z, or Jost, or hypothetical UFA signing Mr. X. It will hurt. We got lucky last time at the XD, it won't spare us this time, whether we have to protect Makar or not.
It's too far away to even really speculate about who exactly we will lose. We don't know if Barrie will still be here, we don't know if we land a big fish UFA, or if EJ will waive his protection slot. We don't even know if Makar will be available to sign before our season is over. All we can be sure of, looking at the roster and prospects, is that SOMEBODY will go to Seattle that we don't want to lose.Exactly. Would you rather lose Girard or Compher? Can't act like it doesn't matter who we lose because we'll lose someone.
You can't even be sure that we will be losing somebody we don't want to lose. For example by not playing Makar and asking EJ to waive (or buy him out) we might be able to protect everybody we want to keep and expose Kerfoot...and you have to agree that most people here would be happy with that. My point is why put ourselves in the situation to have to expose somebody we DO LIKE when it is unnecessary.It's too far away to even really speculate about who exactly we will lose. We don't know if Barrie will still be here, we don't know if we land a big fish UFA, or if EJ will waive his protection slot. We don't even know if Makar will be available to sign before our season is over. All we can be sure of, looking at the roster and prospects, is that SOMEBODY will go to Seattle that we don't want to lose.
I think nobody here will be happy if Kerfoot is still on the team in 2021.You can't even be sure that we will be losing somebody we don't want to lose. For example by not playing Makar and asking EJ to waive (or buy him out) we might be able to protect everybody we want to keep and expose Kerfoot...and you have to agree that most people here would be happy with that. My point is why put ourselves in the situation to have to expose somebody we DO LIKE when it is unnecessary.
It's too far away to even really speculate about who exactly we will lose. We don't know if Barrie will still be here, we don't know if we land a big fish UFA, or if EJ will waive his protection slot. We don't even know if Makar will be available to sign before our season is over. All we can be sure of, looking at the roster and prospects, is that SOMEBODY will go to Seattle that we don't want to lose.
Like I said, if all our prospects fail to the point where we don't care to lose them... That's the only realistic scenario I see where that doesn't come true, and if it does we'll have entirely different things to be sad about.Can we really be sure of even that? lol...*sigh*
Like I said, if all our prospects fail to the point where we don't care to lose them... That's the only realistic scenario I see where that doesn't come true, and if it does we'll have entirely different things to be sad about.