How is Montreal not better? Those three listed are all upgrades.
As for Toronto, it's only money and they are unquestionably better with their additions and you figure all those young kids will be better in year two like we are expecting ours to be.
Regarding TOR, I have no idea how anyone can think Hainsey and Marleau can be worth a combined 9+ mil per at this stage of their careers. And at multiple years too. Was there really that much interest in those two that the prices got pushed up that far? In my opinion easily the two worst FA contracts so far this summer.
Montreal still has not addressed their biggest need. I'm not worried about them at all
Long term Drouin is absolutely an upgrade on Radulov, but in the short term it's debatable however much Radulov is vilified he's a heck of a talent. And at the cost of Sergachev? Lateral move at best.
Alzner is not an upgrade on Markov, no way. Younger, yes, but we're talking about a guy who was WSHs 4/5 D-man here. All he's got on Markov is age. And is Shlemko better than Emelin? Not a fan of the latter, but I'd beg to differ anyway.
Based on roles, I'd put Alzner down as a slight upgrade on Emelin as a defensive D, and Schemko as a major downgrade on Markov as a puck mover/2-way D.
These moves by Bergevin smell of desperation and an urge to "do something". I don't think they got better at all. Younger (discounting the loss of Sergachev) and closer to the cap, but not better. What they still badly need is proper C depth, especially with Claude behind the bench, but they still have the turtleneck as arguably their best centerman. I guess Drouin might line up at C to start the season, but he doesn't exactly fit the Julien mold, does he? Bergevin will have to do something creative around Galchenyuk if they don't trust him, but I don't think he'll be able to with the cap as is.
Regarding TOR, I have no idea how anyone can think Hainsey and Marleau can be worth a combined 9+ mil per at this stage of their careers. And at multiple years too. Was there really that much interest in those two that the prices got pushed up that far? In my opinion easily the two worst FA contracts so far this summer.
Wow. That's a good move by the Leafs. Adding some veteran scoring. Plus the DoMo and Hainsey signings to augment their youth core.
Leafs have no cap room space. Let's offer sheet Connor Brown, he would look great on the B's,can skate plays hard every game, can kill penalties. 2 million a year? Thoughts?
Wow! Thornton's new contract is actually 1 yr $6.75M salary + $1.25M signing bonus for an AAV of $8.0M.
Yeah I'm not sure I like any of the deals our competitors have made in terms of value, but there's no denying both Montreal and Toronto have gotten better, as have other conference teams.
How has Mtl gotten better? Better than what?
One of the worst C group in the league.
No offense from D.
Price 10.5M from 18-19 till he's in a wheel chair in 25-26.
Habs are irrelevant. They are either a bubble playoffs team or DNQ next year.
One of the worst C group in the league.
No offense from D.
Price 10.5M from 18-19 till he's in a wheel chair in 25-26.
Habs are irrelevant. They are either a bubble playoffs team or DNQ next year.
I'm not saying I would have wanted the Bs to do that deal with Marleau.... or Alzner.
But Toronto and Montreal have both arguably gotten better heading into this season.
Boston obtained Postma
I don't know about all that. Drouin, Pacioretty, Galchenyuk, Gallagher, Danault, Weber, Alzner, Shaw, Price... There's some talent there. And it's July 2nd, lots of time to add depth. Especially with $15m in cap space.
A couple years ago the Bruins started stockpiling picks so they wouldn't have to 'get better' on July 1. The better strategy is to get better 2-3 years earlier. Look at the Habs and Leafs prospects, they have nothing. Barring so incredible trades, they're doomed to the middle of the road. The Bruins aren't guaranteed anything but I'd rather take my chances with 18 years olds rather than 38 year old free agents.
I don't care about the money that's the leafs issue. Marleau easily makes them a better team period.
Exactly. Sure, maybe they'll have cap issues down the road. What will that matter to the B's when they beat us in the playoffs or beat us out of a playoff ranking?
Not saying Marleau's the answer for the B's, but we could use an experienced 25-30 goal LW.
I think Montreal has had an absolutely awful offseason. Sure they finished in first this past season, but how can you like what they've done? They lost Emelin and watched Nashville grab him for basically nothing. They signed Alzner to as long of a deal as they did. They paid Price over 10m AAV(!). That doesn't scream success to me and I don't see where they've gotten better.
Watch, they'll probably sweep the B's next season still
I think Montreal has had an absolutely awful offseason. Sure they finished in first this past season, but how can you like what they've done? They lost Emelin and watched Nashville grab him for basically nothing. They signed Alzner to as long of a deal as they did. They paid Price over 10m AAV(!). That doesn't scream success to me and I don't see where they've gotten better.
Watch, they'll probably sweep the B's next season still
Price money years from now makes no difference this season or next season or next.
Schlemko is far better than Emelin and I think Drouin is better then Radulov and has a far higher ceiling.
They can't get away with standing pat in the off-season. Only show in town. The Bruins can hide behind the dominant teams in Boston such as the pats and sox