Ivan13
Not posting anymore
Another somewhat decent comparison I've heard for Saric is Boris Diaw. Diaw is much better defensively.
I could see it, but Dario brings a lot more energy to the court.
Another somewhat decent comparison I've heard for Saric is Boris Diaw. Diaw is much better defensively.
And I'm telling you he plays nothing like that, and I saw the kid play for years. Of the SFs in the NBA, Durant is the one that makes little if any sense as a comparison. If you want to compare him to a Warrior, Green is the only one that makes sense, Å arić isn't as good defensively, but he plays point forward, he can slash, spot up, crash the boards and be relentless on both ends of the court. He is also an emotional leader and a guy that will go through a wall head first if the coach tells him to, an epitome of a Philly style athlete.
Huh? Rubio makes that team tick.He'll be the one thing that holds them back.
Huh? Rubio makes that team tick.
If I based my opinions on NBA2K17, the T-Wolves would be the 5th best team in the league.
I forgot Kris Dunn went 1st overall.Thibs will make a huge difference. He was a great coach in Chicago, but ForPax needed a scapegoat and Roses decline didn't help his case.
Flip Saunders also died right before the season last year, which impacted a lot of the young players as he was a big mentor for them. Plus Towns is going to improve on an unreal rookie year, Wiggins/LaVine are more seasoned and Dunn is the ROY favorite. Not to mention Muhammed/Rubio/Dieng/Pekovic etc
When you put it like that, of course they need an upgrade. But as the team stands, they're a million times better when he's on the floor than when he's not.Yeah, I don't agree with that one bit. They won't get in the top echelon of teams until they get an upgrade on him.
I forgot Kris Dunn went 1st overall.
Dunn is the favorite. Whoever is drafted first is the favorite for RotY according to you.I forgot Kris Dunn went 1st overall.
That doesn't matter. We're talking concencus. Ingram can't be. He wasn't the #1 pick.Why would Dunn be the favorite? IMO it's Ingram who will get big minutes from day 1.
That doesn't matter. We're talking concencus. Ingram can't be. He wasn't the #1 pick.
When you put it like that, of course they need an upgrade. But as the team stands, they're a million times better when he's on the floor than when he's not.
Rubio is a good player and the Wolves are a much better team when he's out there. He just makes things a lot easier for the others when he's running the offense and he's very good defensively. The shooting though, I just can't overlook that part. I like PGs who can shoot and in Rubio's case it's not like he's just a below average shooter, I think he's one of the worst in NBA history based on the numbers. With KAT likely getting a lot of attention inside and Wiggins still developing a consistent outside game, they're going to need all the shooting they can get.
The favourite according to a rookie survey that has been correct once in like 8 years. He's gonna be fighting for minutes with Rubio, whereas Simmons and Ingram will be handed the keys. The first overall pick is pretty much always the consensus favourite, hence why betting odds have it Simmons, Ingram, then Dunn for example.Dunn is the favorite. Whoever is drafted first is the favorite for RotY according to you.
Yeah I get it. Not sure who they can even get that won't cost big assets, assuming Dunn doesn't become elite in his own right.Because the guy that comes in for him isn't all that good. And I think we are having a misunderstanding, my point was that they can't be a top end team with a PG like Rubio.
If you want to base your opinion on draft position and what others such as the odds makers think, that's fine. I think for myself, form my own opinions, and Dunn will be the best rookie. Dunn is a 22 year old man, Simmons has a poor jump shot, and Ingram doesn't have an NBA body. The Canucks will never win a Stanley Cup....The first overall pick is pretty much always the consensus favourite, hence why betting odds have it Simmons, Ingram, then Dunn for example. ...
There's a difference between "In my opinion, Dunn will be the best rookie" and "Dunn is the favourite lol @ u for thinking otherwise".If you want to base your opinion on draft position and what others such as the odds makers think, that's fine. I think for myself, form my own opinions, and Dunn will be the best rookie. Dunn is a 22 year old man, Simmons has a poor jump shot, and Ingram doesn't have an NBA body. The Canucks will never win a Stanley Cup.
Where do you guys think Rubio ends up? I don't think he lasts the year in Minny.
Why would Dunn be the favorite? IMO it's Ingram who will get big minutes from day 1.
Where do you guys think Rubio ends up? I don't think he lasts the year in Minny.
http://sports.yahoo.com/m/7c4fdf2a-cbd4-3e0b-800b-93160ca4051b/phil-jackson:-kobe-bryant.htmlPhil Jackson: Kobe Bryant requested trade during my first Lakers season, Pistons offered Grant Hill
He probably was. His first 5-6 years he put up Lebron type numbershttp://sports.yahoo.com/m/7c4fdf2a-cbd4-3e0b-800b-93160ca4051b/phil-jackson:-kobe-bryant.html
I forgot about this. When healthy Hill was a heckuva player, not saying he was equal to Kobe.