It's realistic. If something comparable happened at your job, a young employee who was clueless gets is shown favoritism, you'd have your resume together the next day. They will respect it if he's good, if not, it's a problem.
That view is not realistic in organizations who grow and develop talent.*
Grig's situation is very much analogous to the training, coaching, and mentoring newly-hired employees receive all the time. Young employees who are perceived to have high asymptotes but do not yet have complete skill sets are often given opportunities to grow and develop "side by side with the big boys". They can't be sent back to college once they've graduated. They already have the book knowledge (analogous to OHL/QMJHL, etc.) but they need to apply it to real-world problems.
Their co-workers in the same work group (=Sabre linemates & teammates) don't update their resumes every time a new employee (Grigs) is hired, even though they know their work productivity (=NHL G-A-Pts totals) may suffer IN THE SHORT TERM because they have to work with a new-hire to aid his/her development.
Their co-workers in other departments (=Rochester lineup) don't update their resume every time a new employee (Grigs) is hired, even though they know that IN THE SHORT TERM they are a capable fill-in for that assignment, whether due to skill or experience.
If the new-hire employee doesn't work out, he/she is moved to another department (= not an option for Grigs until next season), or separated from the company (=traded).
*In a seniority-based system that view would have merit, and a grievance would be filed.
It won't be the first time a first round pick is a bust, happens all the time. He's not a bust yet but I guarantee you Darcy Regier and the rest of them are considering that possibility though they'd never admit it, they've seen many busts before and know the signs.
We needed a big potential #1 center, there he was, kid who only months earlier had been ranked #4 draft prospect in the world, dropping down to us at #12, who knows how much farther he'd have dropped if we didn't grab him. With his stats and the scouts all gushing about his talent I was happy with the pick. All the doubts I had read about him were about his work ethic and poor performance in the playoffs and many defended him pointing out that he had had mononucleosis.
What I want to know is how the best scouts in the game didn't find much fault with his skating and his strength, in football parlance, his 'measureables'.
Did he not come to the Sabres draft combine?
If he doesn't show improvement then he doesn't deserve much playing time, the worst that happens it's a wasted season for him but nowhere near as big a waste as playing in the Q again would be.
He will either stew or work his ass off to gain strength and when he does get into the lineup do something besides wave his stick and glide around. Next season he can go to Rochester.
This has got to be very tough on him, he's been the best at every level he's been at and here he is looking pretty lost - he probably doesn't even understand how this is happening to him, he's sure he's giving it his best. Very easy to lose your confidence and once it's gone it can be your end. He might not have the will.
Good post. Some speculation there at the end, but reasonable & empathetic. I see no reason for BUF to give up on Grigs after 26 games of a 48-game lockout shortened season, nor even after this season.
Aye that friend.
Lets gush over our stable of Stallion-like defensemen.
Regretably, I immediately thought of Rob Paxon's "erection" comment regarding Colton Orr's desire for fisticuffs from the Scott-Kessel post-game discussions in the BUF-TOR GDT thread. Oy!