Send him to Utica, healthy scratch every game. By year two he'll probably retire.
So Van willing to pay a first to get rid of him?
What a stupid post. Not one of those contracts is an anchor, nor does it have any issues signing player's going forward. Rouselle, Beagle, Sutter, Myers,.Pearson, are all decent to good players. Nucks have tons of cap coming off every year for the next 3 years. These contracts are a non issue.It's insane how awful the Nucks are at cap management:
They're a rebuilding team, with lots of their top talent on rookie deals, and they're still in cap hell because they give out non-stop terrible contracts to scrubs. The above 7 players are costing them over $28 mil in cap hit, most of that locked in for 3+ years, and the only one who's deserves more than about $1.5 mil/year is Myers. They're paying replacement level players like core pieces, and didn't even save enough $$ to sign a true core piece in Boeser.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Player AAV Years Remaining Loui Eriksson $6 mil 3 Tyler Myers $6 mil 5 Brandon Sutter $4.375 mil 2 Tanner Pearson $3.75 mil 2 Antoine Roussel $3 mil 3 Jay Beagle $3 mil 3 Tim Schaller $1.9 mil 1
I really like Vancouver's young talent (Pettersson, Boeser, Horvat, Hughes, Demko, Podkolzin, etc.), but they need to get rid of Benning SO badly. It's inexcusable for a rebuilding team to be locked into cap hell for the next 3 years due to consistently overpaying scrubs like crazy.
What a stupid post. Not one of those contracts is an anchor, nor does it have any issues signing player's going forward. Rouselle, Beagle, Sutter, Myers,.Pearson, are all decent to good players. Nucks have tons of cap coming off every year for the next 3 years. These contracts are a non issue.
But then he's not wasting a spot on the Canucks. He simply isn't an NHLer at this point and his comments are unacceptable from a black ace.he's still getting paid the same if we send him to Utica.
But then he's not wasting a spot on the Canucks. He simply isn't an NHLer at this point and his comments are unacceptable from a black ace.
Its not happening, he'll come to Canucks camp & end up in Utica at some point.
The fact its a non-playoff team, 2nd fewest points the last 4 years, and we are close to capped out is sad.
Contracts like this add up. I don't know enough to evaluate all the contracts individually, but lets take the claim that they are all worth at most 1.5M, or so. If they were signed for an average of 2M, to be generous for what a GM should be able to do, that adds up to about 14M in cap space.What a stupid post. Not one of those contracts is an anchor, nor does it have any issues signing player's going forward. Rouselle, Beagle, Sutter, Myers,.Pearson, are all decent to good players. Nucks have tons of cap coming off every year for the next 3 years. These contracts are a non issue.
Agreed. This would've also saved them from giving up a first for Miller. It all adds up.Contracts like this add up. I don't know enough to evaluate all the contracts individually, but lets take the claim that they are all worth at most 1.5M, or so. If they were signed for an average of 2M, to be generous for what a GM should be able to do, that adds up to about 14M in cap space.
That is enough to sign any player in the league with left over, or 2 solid first liners, or a full second line
What about Bobby Ryan with salary retention? (Assuming Melnyk would accept a retention deal)
Send him to Utica, healthy scratch every game. By year two he'll probably retire.
He would already be in Ottawa if he didn't have a NTC...Just get Eriksson to get a doctors note stating he is allergic to the hockey equipment and then trade him to Ottawa where the insurance will cover 80%
Why are you doing buyouts for this summer? That’s like including what Edmonton is hit with for Lucic. Makes no sense to do either of those given the buyout window is closed for the Canucks. For calgary i believe they will have another one since they have players whom have selected arbitration, but they wouldn’t buyout Lucic without trying him for a year first. I have already stated the difference per year if these 2 were actually bought out next summerThe buyout for Lucic is
3.2
4.9
3.6
4.9
.5
.5
.5
.5
Eriksson's is
5.5
5.5
3.5
.6
.6
.6
Those 2 years of 5.5 are very tough to swallow. The Lucic buyout pushes the additional year of 4.9 four years down the road. When you're talking cap, the big issues are: delaying and total amount.
He would already be in Ottawa if he didn't have a NTC...
Callahan isnt going to be playing in Ottawa. This way Loui can collect his paycheque and hang out at home.He would already be in Ottawa if he didn't have a NTC...
Virtually none Canucks fans do either. Its just the few that do think he has value are trying to yell loud in this threadThis a fun thread to read.
Not many non Canuck fans put much value into him
It's just that the more complexity you add to a trade proposal, the less likely it is. So if Ladd goes to Vancouver, would the Isles so much prefer Ryan over Eriksson? If they would, then for sure, a three team trade might be the best, but I don't see why they'd prefer Ryan so much.
This a fun thread to read.
Not many non Canuck fans put much value into him
LE at 50 percent retained for Cogliano?Man, part of me wants him killing penalties back in Dallas, just not at anywhere near that price tag.