Because core players only stay core players if theyre on board with what youre trying to do as an organization. Prior to this summer, absolutely a core player. But after all these shenanigans, you start to see what the player is really like, and what the organization is really like. Most of the time, you dont hold out on core players, play strong arm with them, refuse to negotiate with their agents for long periods of time. You try to stay as amicable as possible. None of those have happened here and its clear as day that the avs will do without him if they have to.
You may be 100% right on what the Avs are thinking here. But if that's the case, they need to grow the **** up. Not every player is going to be Joe Sakic and Milan Hejduk. Most professional athletes have big egos to go with the big talent, and the organization needs to accept that.
So O'Reilly's behavior is disappointing. It doesn't erase the fact that he was the best player on the team last season, and could still be the best player on the team this season and beyond. The Kings traded for two guys with big contracts who crashed a frat party once. The Hawks have continued to hold onto Patrick Kane despite several embarrassing drunken incidents.
And if the Avs supposedly put a "premium" on character, it sure doesn't show with their acquisitions of Bryan Marchment, Darcy Tucker, and Brad ****ing May. That's why I don't think this is as much about "character" as it is the Avs front office having as big an ego as the players they're playing hardball with. You say it's so clear as to what the situation is, but the truth is that NOTHING with this organization is clear, and hasn't been for quite some time. They put premiums on loyalty and secrecy to the point where even the slightest hints of dissension have resulted in those individuals being expunged like yesterday's garbage. You can't say it's so abundantly clear as to how the Avs have handled the situation, because this organization has never communicated with the fans and media in any acceptable manner. It's just assumed that the organization knows what it's doing since they won two Cups. Well...that was a long time ago. The culture has grown stale, and it's time for a change.
Even the Broncos finally admitted when Shanahan had worn out his welcome and it was time for a change, and though they made a gigantic mistake in picking his immediate successor it was the right decision.
Lacroix still exerts far too much power and influence in this organization for a guy who claimed he was stepping back. I don't believe for a moment that Sherman is merely a puppet, but if he ever did something that the Lacroix Brain Trust didn't approve, like engage in active negotiations with O'Reilly instead of this take-it-or-leave-it stance.
Ugh...We've always had defensively responsible players in our bottom 6. ROR, McClement, Richardson, Laperriere, even Tucker worked hard. The problem isnt finding these guys. The problem is we RELY TOO HEAVILY on these guys.
Everyone loves to talk about the days of Yelle, Podein...etc. But what you need to understand is, these guys had the sole responsibility of playing defense and to work hard. They chipped in barely any offense whatsoever. The difference between our bottom 6 then and now, is that back then, we had ridiculous scoring from our top 6. Yelle never had more than 27 points in a season.
Please don't use Tucker as an example of anything positive. His acquisition and subsequent failure was one of many reasons why Giguere and Granato lost their jobs.
BTW, you talk about how little our 3rd line scored, but you do remember in our 2000-01 Cup run that our 2nd line in the playoffs consisted of Chris Drury, Dan Hinote, and Ville Nieminen, right?
And moreover, I'm confused as to what your point is here. Losing Yelle ended up hurting the Avs far more than they could've imagined. The PK went down the tubes and the Avs could never find reliability and stability at the checking center position until O'Reilly finally showed up. Any championship team relies heavily on defensive forwards. The Avs didn't rely "too heavily" on these players, they just didn't get good enough players for those positions. Remember our "dream team" with Selanne/Kariya was spiraling hard until they wised up and acquired Konowalchuk.
As for having to overpay...
What about guys like Matt Cullen, who no longer would get a contract like hes had.
Manny Malhotra
Tyler Bozak
Boyd Gordon
Jochen Hecht
Dave Steckel
Kyle Chipchura
Mark Letestu
Other than Cullen, all make less than 2.5 M
Whats lacking is offense from our top 6. Because its makes everyone elses job easier.
Chipchura is barely an NHL player, and slower than Ossi Vaananen without legs. We have better players in Lake Erie. Malhotra hasn't been the same since his eye injury, and if we're gonna go after Bozak, we may as well re-sign O'Reilly.
Steckel!? Gordon!? Are you kidding me?
Alright we agree on this.
But let me ask you this as well.
How many players can you name, in the past 10 years who...
The avs have offered a contract to, that said player has declined, and has signed for MORE than what the avs offered.
To me, its PAINFULLY clear, that when the avs offer contracts, they are absolutely fair, no question.
So to me, it begs the question. Does ROR have really any leg to stand on when it comes to this negotiation in regards to comparables on other teams, his own team, RFA contract history, Avs contract history...anything...
You need to show me where your evidence is that makes this so PAINFULLY CLEAR. The Avs have had a reputation for lowballing UFAs (Laperriere, Brunette, Theodore) and those players have been public that the offers made were insulting, but they were offers made so the Avs can run to the fans (on those rare occasions they actually DO address the fans) and say "hey, we tried." B.S. Unless you have those offers in front of you (and again, given how secretive they are, I'm betting you don't) then you can't say with authority that it's "painfully clear" the offers were fair.
BTW, Alex Tanguay, Adam Deadmarsh, Jose Theodore, Chris Drury, Sandis Ozolinsh, and Craig Anderson are examples of players who signed big contracts after leaving the Avs. And I think Joe Sakic counts since he signed an offer sheet from the Rangers and was fully prepared to leave, and said as much. And yes, I'm going back farther than 10 years because those situations are relevant to the problem at hand.
The one and only time I've ever seen this organization step up and pay big $$$ without much hassle was when they re-signed Roy, Blake, and Sakic following the 2001 Cup victory, and Forsberg upon his many returns. Those players are gone, and ownership needs to realize the reality of the situation here, and that like many legendary sports figures, Pierre Lacroix has stayed on far, far too long.
Okay...overly long post over. Carry on.