No, that response is showing you how you're acting. This will be my last response to this because you're clearly not getting what I'm saying. I'm saying Roy at most would be a minor chip in getting someone useful or completely wasted on a 2-3 line tweener. Why would you waste his potential on a third liner? That's just terrible asset management.
It depends on who the player is. I think Roy and a 1st can be the basis for a trade for someone like Kane as a rental. That's a big move to make for a team that could be seen as taking one last shot at it. It can also be the basis of a trade for a 2nd or 3rd line level player with a contract that goes beyond the end of this season. Roy's potential is not exactly stellar. It's 2nd pairing level at best and the right side is pretty well covered for the next bit so long as Burns, Braun, and Heed are all under contract here. And if you were trying to show I was acting you did a pretty bad job at it because my arguments have been on point for the discussion while yours go completely off the rails making straw men for some point that's not relevant to the topic.