TitansVolsPreds615
Registered User
- Feb 19, 2015
- 2,964
- 807
Vegas was never going to take Craig Smith.We had the chance to keep James Neal to start the season instead of Calle or Craig Smith, lord what a disaster of a summer for Poile.
Vegas was never going to take Craig Smith.We had the chance to keep James Neal to start the season instead of Calle or Craig Smith, lord what a disaster of a summer for Poile.
Agree that we didn't do enough, we definetely should have and it's costing us now BUT St louis isn't that deep in any area and the fact is that they are peaking now. I'd much rather struggle now and catch fire in Feb and go on a deep playoff run like we have done and it's looking like the path we're gonna take again. I just don't see it in the Blues they'll come down to Earth.
But we need something to spark the offense. Is it Kamenev? Pettersson? TDL pickup?
It was a bad decision the moment it was made, it's a bad decision now, it will be a bad decision until the end of time. Who cares if a 4th liner has lots of term on his deal? 4th liners are incredibly easy to replace in this league. The problem is that they think he's more than a 4th liner for some inexplicable reason. If they're going to continue to use him as a middle 6 center, he's actually hurting the team.
It was a bad decision the moment it was made, it's a bad decision now, it will be a bad decision until the end of time. Who cares if a 4th liner has lots of term on his deal? 4th liners are incredibly easy to replace in this league. The problem is that they think he's more than a 4th liner for some inexplicable reason. If they're going to continue to use him as a middle 6 center, he's actually hurting the team.
Big ole fat pass on Ship.
How silly do we look right now for not adding some good veteran wingers? Someone like Vanek or Jagr would've given us some depth scoring options. We just aren't talented enough at wing or center.
Look at St. Louis. They were weak at C and they addressed it by getting Brayden Schenn. They are arguably the best team in the league behind Tampa.
We just didn't do that.
Maybe Forsberg scores 60 and makes up for Neal.I still believe it had more to do with the BFF trio of Jarnkrok, Forsberg and Ekholm, than Jarnkrok being a more valuable asset than Neal.
It was a bad decision the moment it was made, it's a bad decision now, it will be a bad decision until the end of time. Who cares if a 4th liner has lots of term on his deal? 4th liners are incredibly easy to replace in this league. The problem is that they think he's more than a 4th liner for some inexplicable reason. If they're going to continue to use him as a middle 6 center, he's actually hurting the team.
I seem to remember someone saying that Vegas was definitely taking Jarnkrok and wasn't really entertaining a realistic trade option.Another aspect that goes unnoticed is that even if Poile desperately wanted to keep Jarnkrok, it would be a lot easier to leave him unprotected and then negotiate with Vegas on a price to pick someone else than it was to negotiate a price on not taking Neal.
Hell, I'm not even 100% convinced that McPhee would've taken Jarnkrok had he been left unprotected. He might have taken Sissons or rolled the dice on Aberg becoming a 40 point guy or something like that.
I didn't like the Hartnell add in the summer and still am on the fence. He's older for a player and is kinda unknown on what he has left. Banking on Hartnell and Bonino (who was injured when we signed him) + assuming the youth would step up was a huge risk. It's now starting to show that it was a very bad decision.We added Hartnell, and we had to assume/save a roster spot for Fiala in the top 6. There is nothing to indicate Jagr would have signed here, and Vanek had 31 teams to choose from. We added Bonino at center. I'm not sure what else you think we could have done
Poile obviously tried to get Duchene and couldnt. Other than that I'm not sure who you think we should have signed and/or traded for. Sometime the things you really need simply aren't available or else everybody wants the same thing and you can't always outbid everyone or get someone who prefers another destinationI didn't like the Hartnell add in the summer and still am on the fence. He's older for a player and is kinda unknown on what he has left. Banking on Hartnell and Bonino (who was injured when we signed him) + assuming the youth would step up was a huge risk. It's now starting to show that it was a very bad decision.
Or his age and playing style finally caught up with him.Hartnell has been excellent 5-on-5 every year since he left Nashville. Even last year with Sam Gagner and Company on the fourth line, he was great. Jarnkrok and the other bums have sucked the life out of him at even strength, that's the only explanation I've got.
yeah i would look more to linemates. let me know how neal produced with jarnkrok as his line mate. then tell me how neal is producing with the "cast offs" of the NHL. he's the whipping boy for a reason.Or his age and playing style finally caught up with him.
you made that sound appealing. im in.Let's just bring this bad boy full circle and trade Jarnkrok for Shipachyov. Then, through a little revisionist history, Jarnkrok was an unfortunate casualty of the expansion draft and we got a 2nd line center for an expiring contract in Neal.
Course I don't see Poile having any interest in an unproven 30 year old that didn't crack an expansion team's roster but then we did sign Steve Moses to a contract.
We added Hartnell, and we had to assume/save a roster spot for Fiala in the top 6. There is nothing to indicate Jagr would have signed here, and Vanek had 31 teams to choose from. We added Bonino at center. I'm not sure what else you think we could have done