First of all, sign me up for some more underrated Leafs rejects.
Stauffer is probably referring to Keith potentially retiring. But another possibility and my personal preference, is the possibility that the Sharks lose the grievance outright AND don't get to reinstate Kane's contract.
Why Kane's playoff success with Oilers might be good for Sharks
"If Kane wins his grievance, after this season, the Sharks will owe him $19 million of actual cash over the next three seasons, $7 million AAV against the cap. But the impending free-agent Kane won’t get to double-dip. Say the Oilers re-sign him to a three-year, $15 million deal ($5 million AAV) this summer – that would reduce what the Sharks owe Kane in real money, and turn a $7 million cap hit into a $2 million hit.
So in theory, the better that Kane plays, the more relief that the Sharks could receive, in cash, and perhaps most importantly, on the cap. The cap-strapped Sharks will need all the help that they can get to improve the team this offseason."
What that means is that if Kane can't convince an opposing team to give him over 7 million the next 3 years, then he can potentially sign for the league minimum 750k for next year and force the Sharks to cough up the other 6.25 million. And given the history between player and team Kane will absolutely have incentive to stick it to San Jose.
Or better yet Keith retires AND this happens. All the sudden we have a top 6 power forward on a league minimum AND an extra 8.1 million to play with. If that happens I'm gonna go into every Ken Holland thread I've flamed him in to apologize (and there's a lot of them lol).