Heavy Dee
Registered User
- May 29, 2005
- 8,727
- 6,385
Yah Iam sure he would risk his franchise to do that...Uncle Katz is going to pay them under the table
That's something Pocklington would do, not Katz
Yah Iam sure he would risk his franchise to do that...Uncle Katz is going to pay them under the table
The NHL would be all over that. He can simply be “advisor to owner” as many ex-players- but NHL will be watching that like a hawk. Plus Keith says he wants to sign another deal after this. Retiring- he is notKatz can even give him a raise to 2 million and have him actually do real work with some new fancy job title like "defenseman playmaking decision making development coach" or something. He can just drop in once every few weeks to give Bouchard/Broberg some pointers and try to make Nurse somewhat less stupid.
Name once where this has happened? Maybe Iam wrong..Katz can even give him a raise to 2 million and have him actually do real work with some new fancy job title like "defenseman playmaking decision making development coach" or something. He can just drop in once every few weeks to give Bouchard/Broberg some pointers and try to make Nurse somewhat less stupid.
You would think. There was a time where their were rumblings that Keith wouldn't want to hurt Chicago with the cap penalty, but that was when people had expectations they were going to be doing well the next few years.So if Chicago is trying to tank next year for Bedard... Keith retiring would actually be helping them? No?
No. 7.5 million is absolutely massive massive massive for a rebuilding team. People don't realize how much leverage extra cap space is. Patrick Marleau's 6.25 million was dumped for a 1st round pick. Andrew Ladd's 5.5 million was dumped for two 2nds and a 3rd. Being able to eat 7.5 million in cap space from cap strapped teams would land Chicago something like a 1st+2nd from cap strapped contenders.So if Chicago is trying to tank next year for Bedard... Keith retiring would actually be helping them? No?
The team can offer him a position. It just has to be with compensation that is reasonable for the role and a role that is within reason of his skill set.If Keith retires without the Oilers offering him a job. The league is not going to investigate.
But if he retires because he got offered a position on the Oilers, the league is going to investigate?
Keith is almost 40. Not like he's 25 and deciding to retire because the Oilers offered him a 5M job.
That is definitely cap circumvention.
when has this ever happened?
The League recognized that the rule was a bad one but they still made the Oilers pay. The reality was that the Bruins actually gained from the Oilers signing Chia since they no longer had to pay him bug dollars for twiddling his thumbs. The League should have cancelled the compensation. They have done this before when changing rules that were deemed punitive. This is especially true given the value of a 2nd round pick.Mclellan/Chiarelli picks were just bad timing. They didn't add the short lived manager compensation rule specifically because the Oilers were looking for a new GM/Coach.
The pick in the Lucic/Neal deal was rather bullsh*t though.
It is hard to prove until its not. Keith would have no jeopardy from this so if he said anything to anyone or if the relationship between he and the team went bad the team would have big problems.Oh yeah, it is 110% cap circumvention. I'm saying it would be practically impossible to prove. Katz owns quite a few companies, and likely owns "numbered account" companies that are offshore as well (as almost all billionaires do). If Katz wanted to funnel money to Keith, there is a 0% chance the NHL would find out about it. Again, I don't think this will happen, I'm just saying it could.
It was a bad rule, implemented poorly, and lasted all of a year as a result. Oilers got hit a hard by it, but they weren't the only ones as two 2nd round picks and five 3rd round picks were given up in total during the year the rule was in effect, none of which were given back or canceled.The League recognized that the rule was a bad one but they still made the Oilers pay. The reality was that the Bruins actually gained from the Oilers signing Chia since they no longer had to pay him bug dollars for twiddling his thumbs. The League should have cancelled the compensation. They have done this before when changing rules that were deemed punitive. This is especially true given the value of a 2nd round pick.
That may have changed with the Playoff run we just had. Players sometimes want to win and not suck constantly in a great, warm nice cityIt’s very likely we’re on his no trade list.
Not sure how many times we have to do this dance before people get that some players will just never want to come here.
It is hard to prove until its not. Keith would have no jeopardy from this so if he said anything to anyone or if the relationship between he and the team went bad the team would have big problems.
If Keith is willing to retire get him to agree to be traded for a buyout.
Stauffer "suggesting" that the Oilers will have more cap space than some originally thought.
Also said look to a more subtle deal with an Easter Canadian team for a guy who is a ufa in 2023 (Connor Brown is my guess).
So he’s a crappy goalie, overrated, and doesn’t have any competitive fire or desire to play on a winning team. Hard pass.
That could very well be a real position considering elite hockey IQ is the only thing Keith has left and it's the only thing Nurse lacks.
Your right . My bad .Hmm, not that I remember. I know there was a report Varlamov wouldn't come.to Edmonton. Maybe you're thinking of a different Russian goalie? Ha.
Players can retire any time that they want. There would be nothing to investigate. It's the LTIRetirements that are sketchy. But there is nothing in place that would prevent a player from retiring of their own volition and taking a front-office job, nor should there.I could see Bettman launching an investigation if Keith retired this season even without a new job title with the Oilers, with all the cap circumvention that has been going on last decade example Tampa, what a perfect time to clean it up centering on a Canadian team.
Well that would depend on how the guy is being compensated and could be investigated if there was a complaint by someone. If an NHL player is making 2 million a year and he moves into a front office job that normally pays $200,000 a year but the team is paying him 2 million there is an issue.Players can retire any time that they want. There would be nothing to investigate. It's the LTIRetirements that are sketchy. But there is nothing in place that would prevent a player from retiring of their own volition and taking a front-office job, nor should there.