rent free
Registered User
- Apr 6, 2015
- 20,427
- 6,114
If he gets traded for dougie Hamilton you'd think soIs nylander a natural defenseman too?
If he gets traded for dougie Hamilton you'd think soIs nylander a natural defenseman too?
I never said he is a center, I replied to a person who said (and I quote): "Nylander hasnt played C in 4 years. He is a winger."Playing C for 10% of the time doesn't make anyone a center, it really looks like you have no idea what you're talking about tbh.
A snarky response doesn't help you in defense of your garbage argument. He gave you hypo to clearly prove your logic is shit.What a silly question. This thread asked about Nylander vs. Pettersson.
Yes, and he was replying to someone who was repeatedly calling nyalnder a "center". Common logic and reasoning would suggest that when he said "has never played center" he meant nylander has not played center consistently or for an extended period of time, hence calling him a center is, at this moment, incorrect.I never said he is a center, I replied to a person who said (and I quote): "Nylander hasnt played C in 4 years. He is a winger."
The first sentence is factually incorrect. It isn't debatable, it isn't arguable. Nylander played center this year, more than once. No semantics can change that. Perhaps try to follow the discussion a little bit closer before saying that I don't have an idea of what I'm talking about.
"Nylander hasnt played C in 4 years" = nylander has not played center consistently or for an extended period of timeYes, and he was replying to someone who was repeatedly calling nyalnder a "center". Common logic and reasoning would suggest that when he said "has never played center" he meant nylander has not played center consistently or for an extended period of time, hence calling him a center is, at this moment, incorrect.
So who is it that isn't following the discussion close enough?
Feelings mutual"Nylander hasnt played C in 4 years" = nylander has not played center consistently or for an extended period of time
Thats quite the stretch, but you seem to have quite a bit of mental gymnastics going on. Nylander has played center as recently as this year. Nylander is expected to be a center for the Leafs longterm. You being ignorant doesn't change these facts.
Don't bother replying, talking to a brick wall would likely see more progress than anything with you.
Of course we have seen dozens of Canucks fans begging to get Nylander in a Tanev trade.
Specific skill sets make players a more natural fit in certain positions. This is pretty basic knowledge?Is nylander a natural defenseman too?
Lol why are leafs fans getting triggered when u dont say Nylanders a centre? Are u 10 that u cant handle other peoples opinions online. Stop being salty Nylander and Matthews caused u to choke in the first round when u were all expecting a cupSpecific skill sets make players a more natural fit in certain positions. This is pretty basic knowledge?
Honest question; are you 12 years old or are just stupid? You consistently contribute as one or the other, I’m just curious as to which?
My God, NYLANDER IS NOT A CENTER, stop it already you're making yourself look bad by getting triggeredSpecific skill sets make players a more natural fit in certain positions. This is pretty basic knowledge?
Honest question; are you 12 years old or are just stupid? You consistently contribute as one or the other, I’m just curious as to which?
A snarky response doesn't help you in defense of your garbage argument. He gave you hypo to clearly prove your logic is ****.
While I’m honoured you hold me in such high regard, you aren’t the authority on the matter. Nylander has been a centre his entire career and that was always the plan until they won the lottery with Matthews. They’ve shown great chemistry and have been kept together, but this doesn’t change the fact that almost any reliable hockey person you ask will tell you Nylander’s game is more ideally suited for centre ice. That’s always been the case...My God, NYLANDER IS NOT A CENTER, stop it already you're making yourself look bad by getting triggered
Pettersson has taken 1063 NHL faceoffs too. That's some magic trick. Doing all that without playing a game in the league.Nylander is as much Center as Pettersson is. Fun fact, EP has also played center this season.
I'm not sure I'd call a guy who just destroyed the all-time U20 SEL playoff scoring record on his way to a playoff MVP award "non existent in the playoffs".both non existent in the playoffs, ill take Colton Sissons
with the new faceoff rules, it is much more common for wingers to take draws. taking faceoffs does not equal center.Pettersson has taken 1063 NHL faceoffs too. That's some magic trick. Doing all that without playing a game in the league.
Um........no. He sarcastically suggested that Nylander should be chosen over Dahlin, just because I said that Nylander should be an auto choice over Pettersson. Well that's just DUMB.
Pettersson is nowhere near Dahlin's pedigree. Whereas Nylander and Pettersson were both similar ranked draft picks and are a good comparison. Comparing two similar draft picks.....going with the PROVEN one is a no brainer. It's not at all fair to try and spin it to ask "well then, what about Pettersson vs. McDavid(if McDavid was about to be drafted)" because they are NOT AT ALL CLOSE.
Of course in his silly scenario to me, I'd probably go with Dahlin. But that's not the scenario. It's Nylander, an 8th overall Swedish forward from a few years ago with two 60+ point seasons in the NHL, vs. Pettersson, a 5th overall Swedish pick from last year, who has done nothing in the NHL yet and might not ever.
Got it?
Yay.
I'm sorry but there's a difference between objective analysis and being delusional.While I’m honoured you hold me in such high regard, you aren’t the authority on the matter. Nylander has been a centre his entire career and that was always the plan until they won the lottery with Matthews. They’ve shown great chemistry and have been kept together, but this doesn’t change the fact that almost any reliable hockey person you ask will tell you Nylander’s game is more ideally suited for centre ice. That’s always been the case...
And you’re obviously an expert on looking bad but nobody is triggered. You only make yourself look childish with that sort of response. If you don’t think he can play centre then can you provide valid reasons as to why?
Talent analysis always works best when you try to be objective and evaluate based on the individual skills and abilities of a player... consistently allowing your disdain for a particular team enter into the equation only makes it easier for users to ignore you if they haven’t already.
Leave it to Hugh Mungus to get hostile and still manage to whiff on his post. Stop trying to pass of your opinions as facts. Nylander has been a center his whole career, has played meaningful time their with the Leafs and manage,ent has said many times they expect him to play center long term. Careful who you call delusional.I'm sorry but there's a difference between objective analysis and being delusional.
Please explain how nylanders game is more suitable for center ice? Because the last time I checked there's a big defensive responsibility on a center. Hovering doesn't cut it at center ice and they would be wise to keep him away from there like they have ever since he entered the league. You being delusional doesn't change any facts unfortunately
Ok...Leave it to Hugh Mungus to get hostile and still manage to whiff on his post. Stop trying to pass of your opinions as facts. Nylander has been a center his whole career, has played meaningful time their with the Leafs and manage,ent has said many times they expect him to play center long term. Careful who you call delusional.
This literally holds no significance when determining the position nylander plays,Leave it to Hugh Mungus to get hostile and still manage to whiff on his post. Stop trying to pass of your opinions as facts. Nylander has been a center his whole career, has played meaningful time their with the Leafs and manage,ent has said many times they expect him to play center long term. Careful who you call delusional.