comparing 2 players at similar calibre, tie breaker goes to the centreman over the winger, not to mention he's putting up more points then Marner by alot, how can anyone even vote Marner at this point.
I swear I here this argument from you everytime either to make excuses when a Leafs player is in a slump or in this case you trying to marginalize a fine young player by inferring he is lucky and playing over his head.Barzal also happens to have a 12% sh% which ain’t going to last.
What’ll be interesting is to see if Barzal can sustain this type of shooting and scoring. Even in Juniors he only had one season of notable goal scoring.
I swear I here this argument from you everytime either to make excuses when a Leafs player is in a slump or in this case you trying to marginalize a fine young player by inferring he is lucky and playing over his head.
In the end who cares. Barzal is well on his way to bettering Marner's 61 pt rookie season. And with a game in hand is 5 goals and 7 points better as a rookie to a sophomore while playing the more important position we were told last year. You don't need to cite shooting %'s to know this.
Oh I see you hedging your bets now. Barzal doesn't have to beat Marner's amazing 61 points I hear they are. He was picked #16 not #4 in the same draft. Expectations are Marner should be miles ahead of a #16 pick. But we know this is not the case. We Barzal fans will take this as a moral victory.Cute that you seem to follow my posts so closely.
Anyways, it’s simply a reality that a 12% sh% is difficult to maintain. Maybe he will break the norm and keep it up, probably not though. A quick glance at his HockeyDB page will show he’s hardly been a sniper against lower levels of play, seems unlikely he’ll turn into one in the NHL
Maybe he beats Marners 60 point rookie campaign, though maybe he doesn’t. Still plenty of hockey left to play.
Oh I see you hedging your bets now. Barzal doesn't have to beat Marner's amazing 61 points I hear they are. He was picked #16 not #4 in the same draft. Expectations are Marner should be miles ahead of a #16 pick. But we know this is not the case. We Barzal fans will take this as a moral victory.
You’re one of the whiniest little posters when it comes to anything leafs. You’re like a little kid who screams “la la la la la” when presented anything but exactly what you want to hear, so there’s never any point in actually discussing anything with you. You just become insufferable.Oh I see you hedging your bets now. Barzal doesn't have to beat Marner's amazing 61 points I hear they are. He was picked #16 not #4 in the same draft. Expectations are Marner should be miles ahead of a #16 pick. But we know this is not the case. We Barzal fans will take this as a moral victory.
ExcellentYou’re one of the whiniest little posters when it comes to anything leafs. You’re like a little kid who screams “la la la la la” when presented anything but exactly what you want to hear, so there’s never any point in actually discussing anything with you. You just become insufferable.
lolYou’re one of the whiniest little posters when it comes to anything leafs. You’re like a little kid who screams “la la la la la” when presented anything but exactly what you want to hear, so there’s never any point in actually discussing anything with you. You just become insufferable.
Cute that you seem to follow my posts so closely.
Anyways, it’s simply a reality that a 12% sh% is difficult to maintain. Maybe he will break the norm and keep it up, probably not though. A quick glance at his HockeyDB page will show he’s hardly been a sniper against lower levels of play, seems unlikely he’ll turn into one in the NHL
Maybe he beats Marners 60 point rookie campaign, though maybe he doesn’t. Still plenty of hockey left to play.
Not really. Almost 40% of the forwards who played 70 games or more last year shot 12% or higher
Cute that you seem to follow my posts so closely.
Anyways, it’s simply a reality that a 12% sh% is difficult to maintain. Maybe he will break the norm and keep it up, probably not though. A quick glance at his HockeyDB page will show he’s hardly been a sniper against lower levels of play, seems unlikely he’ll turn into one in the NHL
Maybe he beats Marners 60 point rookie campaign, though maybe he doesn’t. Still plenty of hockey left to play.
Auston Matthews is shooting significantly higher than 12%, does that mean you expect his production to be unsustainable as well?
You’re one of the whiniest little posters when it comes to anything leafs. You’re like a little kid who screams “la la la la la” when presented anything but exactly what you want to hear, so there’s never any point in actually discussing anything with you. You just become insufferable.
his truth is the equivalent of trump yelling "fake news" whenever he gets presented with any facts beyond the ones he wants to show.The truth usually burns peoples bums pretty good as I can see from this post.
This didn't age too well.ask me 2 weeks ago and barzal hands down but Marner got his grove back
Barzal with a hatty today. Looks like your 12% unsustainable shooting argument will have to wait for another day.Good for you?
Personally I don’t see why the two are even in competition with on another. I watch Barzal play a few times a year, good player, just not sure if he’s going to necessarily reach the high expectations set on him. The pressures on I suppose
comparing 2 players at similar calibre, tie breaker goes to the centreman over the winger, not to mention he's putting up more points then Marner by alot, how can anyone even vote Marner at this point.
Oh I see you hedging your bets now. Barzal doesn't have to beat Marner's amazing 61 points I hear they are. He was picked #16 not #4 in the same draft. Expectations are Marner should be miles ahead of a #16 pick. But we know this is not the case. We Barzal fans will take this as a moral victory.
You wast to see a point.You’re one of the whiniest little posters when it comes to anything leafs. You’re like a little kid who screams “la la la la la” when presented anything but exactly what you want to hear, so there’s never any point in actually discussing anything with you. You just become insufferable.
Mitch Marner, C | 36 | 4 | 21 | 25 |
Mathew Barzal, C | 36 | 12 | 23 | 35 |
Because Marner was actually in the NHL at 19 and had a great season last year...
If Lou could flip Marner for Barzal he woud do it in a heartbeat