I don't get the negativity towards Puljujarvi at all. People are giving up on a player who was projected to turn into a Kovalchuk type with the pedigree he has after four games? It's like watching people attack Stamkos in his rookie season.
The kid just needs ice time to figure it out.
I'm not sure where you're really coming from here.
1. There's really no negativity in here. Just realistic eye tests, and it's
criticism of the fact that's he's still in the NHL. No one is blaming him.
2. It's pretty clear that in those 4 games, that he isn't ready for the NHL. For a team that has been lambasted year after year for rushing prospects, your opinion seems...less fitting.
3. Everyone is promoting for him to be sent to the AHL to work on his game more and work up towards the NHL. No one is upset that he hasn't figured it out in 4 games.
4. Many 18 year olds don't cut in the NHL to begin with, unless they are clear cut 1st overall picks that are legitimately ready to step into the league.
What do you think is better? Letting him play limited minutes, learning bad habits in the NHL because of the need to keep up or playing top end minutes in the AHL, learn the NA game with the size of the rink and speed and develop?