CantLoseWithMatthews
Registered User
- Sep 28, 2015
- 49,721
- 59,459
no, but I do want to change our PP so he's not such a crucial part of itso you're telling me you wanna sign a pp specialist for 8 years?
no, but I do want to change our PP so he's not such a crucial part of itso you're telling me you wanna sign a pp specialist for 8 years?
You have a good point. One thing to consider though, AJ kills penalties and plays PP. He's an all situation guy. Josh Leivo is a solid top 6 winger that can play up and down the lineup but he is very one dimensional. JVR is also very one dimensional as a W. If we were to replace him, I would much rather have another toolsy guy in there like AJ who will lighten the load from the other role players and it will also allow him to pick up some extra playing time regardless of where in the lineup he plays.
Leivo/ JVR are guys who will never see the ice if we are defending the lead. These past 10 games JVRs minutes have gone down drastically and it isn't all Babs trying to phase him out. Majority of it has to do with us protecting leads. I don't know how involved a guy can get in the game while sitting on the bench.
1) BennThere is no doubt in my mind that JVR is here to stay. You just cant replace his goal scoring. Some short little midget in the minors isnt going to replace JVRs net front presence. I couldnt name 15 LWS in the game right now better than JVR, can you? He is an elite LW . Look at how consistent he is. Unlike Marner, or Nylander, or Kadri, who have been cold this season, JVR stays as old reliable. He is the second best forward on the team currently.
1) Benn
2) Ovi
3) Marchand
4) Panarin
5) Gaudreau
6) Forsberg
7) Ehlers
8) Rakell
9) Huberdeau
10) Saad
11) Hall
12) Landeskog
13) Schwartz
14) Tkachuk
15) Hoffman
16) Pacioretty
17) Skinner
18) Marchessault
19) Teravainen
20) Kreider
are all better
don't worry, we will be perfectly fine without JVR
If you have to create custom criteria to make jvr look better than he really is relative to his peers then so be it. Pretty pointless attempt thoughHow many of them have scored at a around a 30 goal pace every year for the last 5 years?
I really can't take your post seriously .Did you just call JVR our second best forward? Also calling johnsson a midget is real mature. I'm sure you thought the same of Marner, the leafs real second best forward this year.There is no doubt in my mind that JVR is here to stay. You just cant replace his goal scoring. Some short little midget in the minors isnt going to replace JVRs net front presence. I couldnt name 15 LWS in the game right now better than JVR, can you? He is an elite LW . Look at how consistent he is. Unlike Marner, or Nylander, or Kadri, who have been cold this season, JVR stays as old reliable. He is the second best forward on the team currently.
Marner and Willy are tied for 2nd imo. Otherwise I agree completelyI really can't take your post seriously .Did you just call JVR our second best forward? Also calling johnsson a midget is real mature. I'm sure you thought the same of Marner, the leafs real second best forward this year.
If you have to create custom criteria to make jvr look better than he really is relative to his peers then so be it. Pretty pointless attempt though
No, but saying it has to be over the last 5 years and that all those wingers must be pure goal scorers to needlessly disqualify superior wingers is stupid and transparent. I hope you know that it is impossible to take someone as disingenuous as you seriously and I have no interest in humoring youGoal scoring measurement as a metric for a goal scoring winger is "custom" criteria, now I've heard of just about everything.
So humor me, can you answer my completely absurd baseless original question?
how many of them just stand in front of the net and wait for pucks to get to them and do nothing else?How many of them have scored at a around a 30 goal pace every year for the last 5 years?
No, but saying it has to be over the last 5 years and that all those wingers must be pure goal scorers to needlessly disqualify superior wingers is stupid and transparent. I hope you know that it is impossible to take someone as disingenuous as you seriously and I have no interest in humoring you
There is zero chance that the Leafs trade Johansson without first giving him a shot at earning a roster spot. The kid has earned his reps with this organization and he will get his chance soon.Johnsson might very well be 1 of the bargain chips Lou Lam is willing to use to upgrade this team for the playoffs..
That seems more likely than thinking he is JVR replacement next year.
I don't think it's under appreciation. Do you want to overpay and use up crucial cap space for a player that's declining in front of or eyes when we have cheeper options that might even fit in better then JVR.The under-appreciation of JVR is astounding on this board.
I'm afraid to ask but who is the best lwer on the leafs then?JVR isn't even the best left winger on the Leafs.