Exactly. We had "interesting" stats on this forum too, mostly designed to figure out why Smith's stats weren't as bad as many on this forum claim him to be. He's actually a decent mid-level guy and he COSTS A HECK OF A LOT LESS than the brain surgeons Kenny loves. Ken needs to clear out the contracts that won't let him really do anything substantial. With guys like Mantha, Athanasiou, Larkin, and Tatar needing contracts soon, why would you blow that up by keeping E, Abby and even Helm?
Maybe Holland just doesn't has the motivation to move guys who he'd have to work to move, and that he doesn't see a great difference between keeping E or Smith (though he'd prefer to keep both because he doesn't trust the kids to do anything). It has to come down to Holland either liking some of these guys a lot more than we do, the market is even worse than we think, or Holland has just frozen over the decision and is incapable of doing it.
Whatever the reason it boils down to the same thing and it's the club constantly fighting its inertia to make a move.
How do you come to the conclusion it's just an excuse? Who do you think is taking our garbage players on bad contracts? You'd have to attach assets to E to move him probably the same with abby. The reason we're talking about trading younger guys with better contracts is because they don't have negative value. The point is to garner assets not give them away just to free up cap space. We don't need cap space at this point..the priority right now should be selling off whatever we can to gain as many futures as possible.
I'm not Fugu, but I'll chime in here. I think it's a bit of an excuse because moving Smith doesn't really make the team better while we keep D who are worse (arguably much worse in some ways). Let's say we have to pack a second with Ericsson to move him and we get back a fourth. So what. Is the fourth really that much worse than the second aside from the optics of it and is losing Ericsson really a bad thing? I think the answer is no for both of those things, and it should mean we keep the better player in his place while opening up roster/cap space for other moves (and actual cap space, not this thing where we plan on spending $6 million over the cap again).
If we're not actively tanking than we should be trying to ice the best team possible. If that means finding a way to move Ericsson or Kronwall or Gator or Helm and keeping Smith or whoever, then that's what should be happening.