Baxterman
Registered User
- Aug 27, 2017
- 6,939
- 1,499
Most of you will be disappointed when Kane gets paid big money with term.
We won't be disappointed the moronic team that signs him to that sort of deal will be.
Most of you will be disappointed when Kane gets paid big money with term.
And a good prospect that’s won rookie of the year in the AHL and another conditional pick. As a rental.And yet he’s only worth a 2nd......seems to be a disonnect with what you’re trying to sell. Tatar got unconditional 1st, 2nd and 3rd.
Keep pretending GMs don’t see red flags.
Why?We won't be disappointed the moronic team that signs him to that sort of deal will be.
Short sample size for the sharks but so far he has great chemistry with his line mates and has no problem dishing them the puck.
As a Ducks fan, I couldn't be more excited than to see Kane sign with the Sharks.
Why?
If a team has confidence in their leaders, signing Kane won't be a problem. Those that don't have confidence in their leaders will probably view Kane as a risk. I think that's pretty much the rub here. There are plenty of teammates over time that are pains in the ass but if they help you win, which Kane definitely can in the right situation, you can make it work. Chances are Kane won't be a Shark beyond this season and if that's the case, so be it. If he signs somewhere that has a strong group of leaders, I think he'll be just fine because I think people exaggerate how his attitude actually affects his teammates. I mean if a guy like Joe Thornton will vouch for him, he can't be that bad.
Kane's an interesting player - he's a decent goalscorer and a volume shooter. Really athletic - fast and strong. He kind of does it on his own. Doesn't seem to matter if his teammates are good or bad, he uses speed to gain the zone and fire off lots of shots. Good forechecker and PKer...not a very good playmaker or on the power play.
He does have some baggage though. Didn't get along in the locker room with the Jets, seemed to piss off some Sabres at the end of his tenure there. He's had some other off-ice issues too. But he's certainly a useful player and there will be interested GMs. I don't know if Vegas is the perfect fit or whether it would turn into a disaster for him...I like to think he's got his head on straight enough to handle it.
I agree with those saying he doesn't get big term. $6M x 3 would make sense I think.
Jumbo is a leader and Kane is in the honeymoon period. Anything said publicly, now, is meaningless.
My point still stands. Joe would not go public with anything now, if ever.They've been friends for years though so it's not like they just met.
My point still stands. Joe would not go public with anything now, if ever.
The point that Joe is a leader and he wouldn’t speak out now even if he had cause to. It’s really not a difficult concept to grasp. But given you won’t even acknowledge Kane calling in hungover this year I’m not surprised you missed my point.What point still stands? Jumbo hasn't said anything publicly. It was that their GM asked the leadership group about Kane and whether it would work and they went to bat for him. Among the players, he is not the pariah that a bunch of fans with very little information overall make it out to be.
I think he wants to sign with a decent team, he’s been on trashers, jets and sabres before the sharks.I think the Sharks will try to give him a bridge deal, I don't think he is going to take it. He's probably going to whoever pays him the most.
The point that Joe is a leader and he wouldn’t speak out now even if he had cause to. It’s really not a difficult concept to grasp. But given you won’t even acknowledge Kane calling in hungover this year I’m not surprised you missed my point.
By all means please sign him.
It's more like you just don't get it. This is pointing out a private conversation between the GM and his leadership group of players asking about Kane. That is an opportunity for all involved to voice their displeasure about such a potential. If they had said no and DW did not acquire him, we wouldn't have even known that conversation took place. The only reason why this is known is because DW made it a point to reference that in an interview regarding the acquisition. As for the hangover stuff, I'm not sure what you're referencing. I know of the 2016 hangover business during the NBA All-Star weekend so if something happened this year, I'd need to see it before I can judge it. However, that kind of thing happens a lot more than people care to realize. But the point was that your point is pretty lame due to the fact that you're obviously not understanding what is being said in response since you're still making it about a public Thornton comment when it's not about that at all.
I get it just fine. You're not dealing in reality, so I'm done here.
Atlanta and Winnipeg are the same franchise, just AS Winnipeg and Arizona are as is QUE/COLI think he wants to sign with a decent team, he’s been on trashers, jets and sabres before the sharks.
Money will be a huge part but I don’t think he will sign with a bottom feeder.