Adams should have moved him at the draft.
No, he's 100% doing the right thing holding onto him until he gets his pound of flesh. Eichel's under contract for 5 more years.
Jack Eichel can kick rocks. Entitled baby.
This doesn't make much sense and doesn't mesh with your ownership group.No, he's 100% doing the right thing holding onto him until he gets his pound of flesh. Eichel's under contract for 5 more years.
I think the ownership has learned from their previous lessons, personally.This doesn't make much sense and doesn't mesh with your ownership group.
This doesn't make much sense and doesn't mesh with your ownership group.
Not if they are inserting themselves into the trade. According to the athletic they said he has to go west.I think the ownership has learned from their previous lessons, personally.
So do we lol. Anyone with half a brain knows that’s the ideal landing spot. “League source” can kiss my ass.Not if they are inserting themselves into the trade. According to the athletic they said he has to go west.
It doesn't make sense that people think the value is going to rise enough to make keeping him around make sense. He doesn't want to be there, how's that's going to work? Strip him of the C next?It doesn’t make sense to not trade a superstar for less than value?
Ok, well, I guess you don't have to believe it. It's just that there is ample history of it being true.So do we lol. Anyone with half a brain knows that’s the ideal landing spot. “League source” can kiss my ass.
It doesn't make sense that people think the value is going to rise enough to make keeping him around make sense. He doesn't want to be there, how's that's going to work? Strip him of the C next?
At some point the value of having this over is going to be part of any trade. I don't think eichel is going to bring back scraps, or should, but "maximizing" the return has to at some point coincide with properly orienting the franchise for the future. That doesn't happen until he's gone, it's like a dark cloud following them around.Let him sit on a couch and cry for five years. He’s not getting moved for shit like Drury is offering
You are kind of wrong here.
As per 34.3 of the CBA, players agree that their medical records are not private. I refer you to 34.3 (c) (iii). Also, I refer you to 34.3 (c) (v): Should the Club contemplate an assignment of a Player's SPC to another Club(s), the Club's Club Personnel may furnish all of such Player's Medical Information to the contemplated assignee Club(s)' Club Personnel, including, without limitation, via the AHMS; provided, however, that should the assignment not occur, such information shall be returned or destroyed promptly if in hard copy and/or any access via the AHMS shall be revoked promptly.
Of course BUF has the option to share or not to share, but Eichel (if you read the whole section 34.3) and all players as per the CBA give up the "privacy" that other people are privileged to have. The different subsections talk about some of the occasions and reasons for this. Other teams did share medical records ith other teams this very offseason before deals were agreed to. Buffalo is choosing to act differently. You can't possibly believe it is because they are doing Jack a favor here. Now what is interesting is that the very language here says "contemplate" assignment. Not "agree to a trade" or "have a 'serious offer'". If they just "contemplate" an offer they can share. They are choosing not to do so.
That's absolutely their choice, but it would be incredibly naive to think that other teams wouldn't be turned off by that.
Jack Eichel can kick rocks. Entitled baby.
Maybe he can do light work but needs an op to stabilize his issue if he wants to play heavy contact sports.
LOL, absolutely not. Nope. Nada.
I like Eichel a lot, but Ottawa has neither the budget, the assets, or timeframe to accommodate a trade for him. Plus he's within the division.