Nothing to work with there. The Ducks are way better off taking a shot at drafting an elite young player at six. If those pieces were the type we would want to build around, you wouldn't be piling them up for a draft pick.
Respect that you opt to go that direction, but let's be clear.
Rangers consider my offer only b'c we have other aspects on the horizon both in terms of emerging youth and others requiring $.
My offer had value and was sufficiently talented, but bottom line is a guy like Buch has to yield to Chytil, etc.
Unless those guys were way better than Kappo, Kravtsov, etc, all who need mins, they would present my offer and if it is not a fit for Ducks on this turn, something similar will be made elsewhere.
I mean its decently valued trade(but i dont think its something the ducks would be into)
Essentially we get Buch, seems like a 2nd line winger.... a PPQB/top 4 RHD in Deangelo and 22OA.
We could possibly move 22 + 27 and try to get back in the top 15.
But where the ducks are as a team i think our biggest need is elite talent, and really the only way to get that is through the draft... so unless were trading that 6th overall for like a Patrick Laine(or a top 12 pick +), i dont really see us moving it... i think our team just wanted to see what types of offers we might get... some teams in the top 12-15 might want to trade up to claim a guy like Askarov rossi or Drysdale.
Appreciate that you thought value was sufficient even tho not a fit.
As for specific assets, I thought NY retaining 1.5 on Deangelo was signif, but apparently not.
Thanks for the share.